Austria (PinionNewswire) — In the world of blockchain technology, there’s a fundamental problem known as the “Blockchain Trilemma.” It states that a decentralizedAustria (PinionNewswire) — In the world of blockchain technology, there’s a fundamental problem known as the “Blockchain Trilemma.” It states that a decentralized

DMD Diamond Announces the First EVM-Compatible Blockchain Powered by Asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerance

In the world of blockchain technology, there’s a fundamental problem known as the “Blockchain Trilemma.” It states that a decentralized network can only have two of three properties: decentralization, security, and scalability.

Most modern Layer-1 blockchains (L1) are forced to make tradeoffs. Ethereum sacrifices scalability for decentralization. Solana and BSC often sacrifice decentralization for speed.

HoneyBadger BFT (HBBFT) consensus, which has been successfully pioneered and deployed by DMD Diamond in its v4 mainnet, provides a mathematically elegant solution to common blockchain limitations. This is achieved by fundamentally changing the negotiation paradigm between nodes. DMD Diamond prioritizes maximum decentralization over the speed of Solana and the scalability of Ethereum. This strategic focus has clearly established DMD Diamond in a niche where its unique consensus engine makes it the preferred Layer 1 for projects requiring maximum decentralization.

1600x900 1 DMD Diamond Announces the First EVM-Compatible Blockchain Powered by Asynchronous Byzantine Fault ToleranceThe Leader Problem and the Synchronicity Trap

To understand the power of DMD Diamond’s HBBFT implementation, we must first understand why others are slow.

Most modern consensus algorithms (e.g., PBFT, Tendermint, HotStuff) rely on synchrony or partial synchrony. This means that for the network to function, nodes must have consistent clocks or wait for a message within a certain timeout. Furthermore, these systems typically use a leader-based process. One node proposes a block, and the others vote.

  • Problem: If the leader acts maliciously or their internet connection is unstable, the entire network slows down or stops until a new leader is elected.
  • Result: As the network grows (decentralization increases), latency increases exponentially. The network becomes slow and fragile.

HBBFT: The Asynchronous Revolution

HBBFT is the first practical asynchronous BFT consensus algorithm, and DMD Diamond is the first blockchain to combine this cooperative consensus with EVM compatibility.

The word “asynchronous” is key here. HBBFT makes no assumptions about message delivery times. The DMD Diamond network continues to function even if messages between nodes are delayed indefinitely.

In DMD’s HBBFT implementation, there is no single leader. Instead of one node proposing a block, all nodes propose their transactions simultaneously in a cooperative manner.

How does this resolve the compromise?

  • Scalability without loss of decentralization: Since there is no leader, network performance does not degrade drastically when new nodes are added. DMD Diamond’s speed is limited only by the throughput of the slowest group of honest nodes, not by the latency (ping) of the farthest node.
  • Resilience to adverse conditions: In traditional blockchains, a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack or internet outage can halt consensus. DMD Diamond continues finalizing transactions as soon as the data arrives, regardless of how long it takes.

Under the Hood: The Three Pillars of HBBFT Technology

How does HBBFT achieve this magical result? It uses a combination of three complex cryptographic primitives, which DMD Diamond utilizes to deliver industry-first features.

1. Threshold Encryption

In traditional blockchains (like Ethereum), validators see the contents of a transaction before including it in a block. This leads to MEV (Miner Extractable Value)—frontrunning and censorship.

In DMD Diamond, transactions are encrypted by the user. Validators blindly agree on the order of transactions. Decryption occurs only after the order is fixed and cannot be changed.

  • Result: Complete protection against frontrunning and censorship at the protocol level—a unique selling point for DMD Diamond’s DeFi ecosystem.

2. Erasure Coding

Instead of each node broadcasting a full block of data to all others (which clogs the communication channel), HBBFT splits the data into N fragments. To recover the original data, it is sufficient to collect any N-f fragments (where f is the number of possible dishonest nodes).

  • Result: Enormous bandwidth savings. This allows the DMD Diamond network to scale, processing more data without overloading the network.

3. Atomic Broadcast Consensus (ACS)

This is a mechanism that allows all nodes to agree on which encrypted data packets will be included in the next block without electing a leader.

Comparison Chart: HBBFT vs. Others

Conclusion

DMD Diamond’s implementation of HBBFT solves the scalability and decentralization problem not by overclocking hardware, but by eliminating the bottleneck—time synchronization and dependence on a leader.

By allowing nodes to operate at different speeds and process data in parallel, DMD Diamond creates a network that is:

  • Secure as Bitcoin (and even more so, thanks to its asynchronous nature).
  • Fast as modern L1s.
  • Fair (protected from transaction manipulation via Threshold Encryption).

This makes DMD Diamond an ideal candidate for the next generation of DeFi applications and enterprise blockchains, where reliability and fairness are more important than hype.

Find more information at bit.diamonds 

Read the whitepaper at GitHub

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

The post Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP ETFs have crossed $1 billion in assets
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 02:55
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York’s top financial regulator urged banks to adopt blockchain analytics, signaling tighter oversight of crypto-linked risks. The move reflects regulators’ concern that traditional institutions face rising exposure to digital assets. While crypto-native firms already rely on monitoring tools, the Department of Financial Services now expects banks to use them to detect illicit activity. NYDFS Outlines Compliance Expectations The notice, issued on Wednesday by Superintendent Adrienne Harris, applies to all state-chartered banks and foreign branches. In its industry letter, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) emphasized that blockchain analytics should be integrated into compliance programs according to each bank’s size, operations, and risk appetite. The regulator cautioned that crypto markets evolve quickly, requiring institutions to update frameworks regularly. “Emerging technologies introduce evolving threats that require enhanced monitoring tools,” the notice stated. It stressed the need for banks to prevent money laundering, sanctions violations, and other illicit finance linked to virtual currency transactions. To that end, the Department listed specific areas where blockchain analytics can be applied: Screening customer wallets with crypto exposure to assess risks. Verifying the origin of funds from virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Monitoring the ecosystem holistically to detect money laundering or sanctions exposure. Identifying and assessing counterparties, such as third-party VASPs. Evaluating expected versus actual transaction activity, including dollar thresholds. Weighing risks tied to new digital asset products before rollout. These examples highlight how institutions can tailor monitoring tools to strengthen their risk management frameworks. The guidance expands on NYDFS’s Virtual Currency-Related Activities (VCRA) framework, which has governed crypto oversight in the state since 2022. Regulators Signal Broader Impact Market observers say the notice is less about new rules and more about clarifying expectations. By formalizing the role of blockchain analytics in traditional finance, New York is reinforcing the idea that banks cannot treat crypto exposure as a niche concern. Analysts also believe the approach could ripple beyond New York. Federal agencies and regulators in other states may view the guidance as a blueprint for aligning banking oversight with the realities of digital asset adoption. For institutions, failure to adopt blockchain intelligence tools may invite regulatory scrutiny and undermine their ability to safeguard customer trust. With crypto now firmly embedded in global finance, New York’s stance suggests that blockchain analytics are no longer optional for banks — they are essential to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 08:49