AI transformation works only when companies map their processes clearly and ensure humans guide AI decisions. However, many early-stage companies, and even matureAI transformation works only when companies map their processes clearly and ensure humans guide AI decisions. However, many early-stage companies, and even mature

Eamon Graziano: How to Advise Boards on AI-Powered Business Transformation

AI transformation works only when companies map their processes clearly and ensure humans guide AI decisions. However, many early-stage companies, and even mature firms, still lack documented workflows or standard operating procedures. In some cases, customer relationship management systems grow in scattered, improvised ways rather than through intentional design. This absence of structure creates friction long before AI enters the picture and becomes a major obstacle as businesses try to scale.

“You need to make sure that you understand your process, you understand what needs to improve in your process and that is written down somewhere and mapped out,” says Eamon Graziano, CEO at B&E Management & Consulting.

Boards often move quickly toward AI tools without first examining the systems those tools must support. Without a clear foundation, AI shifts from strategic asset to guesswork. For Graziano, process mapping is more than a prerequisite for AI implementation. It is a core requirement for sustainable growth.

Balancing AI Capability with Human Judgment

A former Marine Corps Officer turned business growth leader, Graziano has built a career scaling small businesses into thriving enterprises through disciplined operations, strategic clarity, and the integration of advanced technologies, including AI. His background in high-pressure decision making and cross-functional leadership shapes the practical, people focused approach he brings to AI adoption.

One of the most persistent misconceptions boards hold is the assumption that AI can replace human involvement entirely. “AI is a sensational tool. It’s a tool that allows humans to do the higher leverage work. However, AI needs to have a human in the loop to work at its peak capacity,” he says.

Take AI-powered helplines. Many still appreciate the speed and convenience they offer, but others will always want to connect with a real person. This divide matters. While AI can handle routine inquiries quickly, a human off-ramp is essential for moments when nuance, emotion, or complex judgment is required. Without such a clear off-ramp to a trained staff member in place, companies risk losing leads, frustrating customers, and creating friction in the experience.

Creating Scalable and Responsible AI Strategies

To help boards navigate AI responsibly, Graziano outlines three practical steps.

1. Map processes end to end. This helps organizations see where gaps exist and where improvement is possible.

2. Select the right tools, systems, or people to support implementation. Each choice must align with the demands of the mapped process and the desired outcomes.

3. Test thoroughly, then keep iterating. Graziano urges organizations to test tools before going live and continue testing for months afterward. He compares long term AI management to training an employee, noting that systems always need refinement. “You need to continue to test and iterate on your AI agents or systems because things are going to change and there’s going to be opportunity to improve them.”

Leadership Mindset in High Pressure Transformation

Graziano’s perspective on AI transformation is shaped in part by his service as a Marine Corps Officer, where responsibility and accountability are core principles. He points to a leadership ethos that encourages individuals to “seek responsibility, take responsibility for your actions.”

When transformation is delegated too far down the organizational chart, alignment can fracture quickly. “To facilitate large scale change, the right level of leadership has to take responsibility for the transformation,” he says. Clear direction from the top helps every contributor understand the purpose behind the change and the standards required to make it successful.

Guiding Boards Toward the Next Stage of AI Adoption

As companies accelerate their use of AI, boards are under pressure to make strategic choices that balance innovation with operational reality. Graziano’s approach grounds those choices in discipline, clarity, and a people first mindset. By mapping processes thoroughly, integrating AI with human oversight, and maintaining continuous improvement, organizations can adopt AI in ways that strengthen, rather than strain, the business.

Readers can connect with Eamon Graziano on LinkedIn.

Comments
Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03717
$0.03717$0.03717
+0.81%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency

Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency

The post Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. President Trump’s administration
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 01:29
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15