ExchangeDEX+

Buy Crypto Markets Spot Futures500X Earn Events

MaGGIe demonstrates superior quantitative performance on HIM2K and M-HIM2K, outperforming MGM-style refinement with its sparse guided progressive refinement.MaGGIe demonstrates superior quantitative performance on HIM2K and M-HIM2K, outperforming MGM-style refinement with its sparse guided progressive refinement.

Matting Robustness: MaGGIe Performance Across Varying Mask Qualities

2025/12/21 00:00

Table of Links

Abstract and 1. Introduction

Related Works
MaGGIe

3.1. Efficient Masked Guided Instance Matting

3.2. Feature-Matte Temporal Consistency
Instance Matting Datasets

4.1. Image Instance Matting and 4.2. Video Instance Matting
Experiments

5.1. Pre-training on image data

5.2. Training on video data
Discussion and References

\ Supplementary Material

Architecture details
Image matting

8.1. Dataset generation and preparation

8.2. Training details

8.3. Quantitative details

8.4. More qualitative results on natural images
Video matting

9.1. Dataset generation

9.2. Training details

9.3. Quantitative details

9.4. More qualitative results

8.3. Quantitative details

We extend the ablation study from the main paper, providing detailed statistics in Table 9 and Table 10. These tables offer insights into the average and standard deviation of performance metrics across HIM2K [49] and M-HIM2K datasets. Our model not only achieves competitive average results but also maintains low variability in performance across different error metrics. Additionally, we include the Sum Absolute Difference (SAD) metric, aligning with previous image matting benchmarks.

\ Comprehensive quantitative results comparing our model with baseline methods on HIM2K and M-HIM2K are presented in Table 12. This analysis highlights the impact of mask quality on matting output, with our model demonstrating consistent performance even with varying mask inputs.

\ We also perform another experiment when the MGMstyle refinement replaces our proposed sparse guided progressive refinement. The Table 11 shows the results where our proposed method outperforms the previous approach in all metrics.

\ Table 11. Compare between previous dense progressive refinement (PR) - MGM and our proposed guided sparse progressive refinement. Numbers are mean on HIM2K+M-HIM2K and small numbers indicate the std.

\ Figure 12. Our solution is not limited to human instances. When testing with other objects, our solution is able to produce fairly accurate alpha matte without training on them. (Best viewed in color and digital zoom).

:::info Authors:

(1) Chuong Huynh, University of Maryland, College Park (chuonghm@cs.umd.edu);

(2) Seoung Wug Oh, Adobe Research (seoh,jolee@adobe.com);

(3) Abhinav Shrivastava, University of Maryland, College Park (abhinav@cs.umd.edu);

(4) Joon-Young Lee, Adobe Research (jolee@adobe.com).

:::

:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

:::

Market Opportunity

Mask Network Price(MASK)

$0.571

$0.571$0.571

+1.09%

USD

Mask Network (MASK) Live Price Chart

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.