The post Sui blames consensus bug for Jan. 14 six-hour network outage appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Sui has published a post-mortem explaining the six-hourThe post Sui blames consensus bug for Jan. 14 six-hour network outage appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Sui has published a post-mortem explaining the six-hour

Sui blames consensus bug for Jan. 14 six-hour network outage

Sui has published a post-mortem explaining the six-hour network outage on Jan. 14, confirming a consensus bug halted activity but user funds were safe.

Summary

  • Sui confirmed a consensus divergence among validators caused its Jan. 14 mainnet outage.
  • The network halted for about six hours while safety mechanisms prevented inconsistent state.
  • Validators deployed a fix and fully restored normal operations later the same day.

Sui has published a post-mortem detailing the cause of the network outage that disrupted mainnet activity on Jan. 14, 2026, temporarily stopping transactions and checkpoint certification across the blockchain.

In a blog post published on Jan. 16, the team said the issue was caused by a divergence in internal consensus among validators. It stressed that the interruption was not linked to heavy network usage, external attacks, or security breaches, and that user funds remained safe throughout the incident.

What went wrong

According to Sui (SUI), an edge-case bug in the way consensus commits were processed caused validators to reach different conclusions when handling certain conflicting transactions. As a result, validators began producing different checkpoint candidates, making it impossible to reach the stake-weighted agreement required to certify a new checkpoint.

When validators detected that a significant portion of the stake was signing conflicting checkpoint data, the network halted by design. This pause prevented an inconsistent state from being finalized, even though it meant block production and transaction execution stopped.

Transaction submissions timed out during the outage, but read-only queries kept serving the final certified state. 

On-chain activity was halted and an estimated $1 billion in value remained temporarily inactive during the roughly six-hour disruption. No certified transactions were reversed, nor did forks take place despite the halt.

Recovery and improvements

Recovery began once the root cause was identified. Validators removed the incorrect consensus data, applied a fix to the commit logic, and replayed the chain from the point of divergence.

After a successful canary deployment by Mysten Labs validators, the wider validator set upgraded and resumed checkpoint signing, allowing the network to return to normal operation later that day.

Sui said the incident confirmed that its safety-first design worked as intended by prioritizing consistency over uptime. At the same time, the team acknowledged the need to shorten recovery times. 

Improved automation for validator operations, increased testing to identify similar consensus edge cases before they reach the mainnet, and early detection of checkpoint inconsistencies are among the planned changes. 

Following a brief incident in late 2024, the Jan. 14 outage was the second major disruption on Sui since its launch in 2023. SUI’s price saw limited volatility, suggesting the market largely viewed the issue as operational rather than structural.

Source: https://crypto.news/sui-consensus-bug-six-hour-network-outage-2025/

Market Opportunity
SUI Logo
SUI Price(SUI)
$1,7824
$1,7824$1,7824
-1,17%
USD
SUI (SUI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump’s Tactics Reignite Crypto’s SEC Dialogue

Trump’s Tactics Reignite Crypto’s SEC Dialogue

Prior to Donald Trump’s influence, cryptocurrency companies primarily encountered the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) through legal battles. Under the leadership of former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, the lack of clear guidance from the commission bred a climate of apprehension, leaving businesses in a perplexed state.Continue Reading:Trump’s Tactics Reignite Crypto’s SEC Dialogue
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:08
UK Regulator Proposes New Crypto Rules to Protect Consumers

UK Regulator Proposes New Crypto Rules to Protect Consumers

UK’s FCA proposes crypto rules to boost transparency, protect consumers, and balance innovation with regulation; consultation open until 2026. The United Kingdom has taken a new step toward regulating the fast-growing crypto sector. On Wednesday, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) released a consultation paper that sets out how the existing financial rules should apply to […] The post UK Regulator Proposes New Crypto Rules to Protect Consumers appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2025/09/18 15:30
FCA, crackdown on crypto

FCA, crackdown on crypto

The post FCA, crackdown on crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United Kingdom enters a decisive phase. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated a consultation to set minimum standards on transparency, consumer protection, and digital custody, in order to strengthen market confidence and ensure safer operations for exchanges, wallets, and crypto service providers. The consultation was published on May 2, 2025, and opened a public discussion on operational responsibilities and safeguarding requirements for digital assets (CoinDesk). The goal is to make the rules clearer without hindering the sector’s evolution. According to the data collected by our regulatory monitoring team, in the first weeks following the publication, the feedback received from professionals and operators focused mainly on custody, incident reporting, and insurance requirements. Industry analysts note that many responses require technical clarifications on multi-sig, asset segregation, and recovery protocols, as well as proposals to scale obligations based on the size of the operator. FCA Consultation: What’s on the Table The consultation document clarifies how to apply rules inspired by traditional finance to the crypto perimeter, balancing innovation, market integrity, and user protection. In this context, the goal is to introduce minimum standards for all firms under the supervision of the FCA, an essential step for a more transparent and secure sector, with measurable benefits for users. The proposed pillars Obligations towards consumers: assessment on the extension of the Consumer Duty – a requirement that mandates companies to provide “good outcomes” – to crypto services, with outcomes for users that are traceable and verifiable. Operational resilience: introduction of continuity requirements, incident response plans, and periodic testing to ensure the operational stability of platforms even in adverse scenarios. Financial Crime Prevention: strengthening AML/CFT measures through more stringent transaction monitoring and structured counterpart checks. Custody and safeguarding: definition of operational methods for the segregation of client assets, secure…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:40