Aave is under pressure. The $AAVE token is down 19.5% on the week, currently trading around $150, as an escalating governance dispute shakes confidence across theAave is under pressure. The $AAVE token is down 19.5% on the week, currently trading around $150, as an escalating governance dispute shakes confidence across the

AAVE Slides Nearly 20% As Governance Fight Rattles Market

2025/12/23 23:49

Aave is under pressure. The $AAVE token is down 19.5% on the week, currently trading around $150, as an escalating governance dispute shakes confidence across the protocol.

The selloff is not technical. It is political.

Aave is now caught in a high-stakes conflict between Aave Labs, the centralized development company founded by Stani Kulechov, and factions within the Aave DAO, made up of token holders and elected delegates. The fallout is already visible on the charts. Whales are exiting. Volatility is rising. And governance decisions are moving markets in real time.

According to market data highlighted by CoinGecko, the governance drama has coincided with sharp drawdowns across the week.

At the center of the dispute is a question that cuts to the core of decentralized finance.

Who owns the protocol?

A fundamental DeFi question comes to the surface

Aave has long been viewed as one of DeFi’s most mature protocols. It runs on smart contracts governed by a DAO. Yet much of the user-facing experience, branding, and integrations are maintained by Aave Labs.

That hybrid structure is now under strain.

Token holders believe governance should control economic flows. Founders argue that building, maintaining, and protecting the protocol’s interface requires centralized coordination. The current conflict is forcing both sides to draw lines.

This tension is not unique to Aave. But few protocols are testing it this publicly, or this expensively.

How A Frontend Swap Change Ignited The Dispute

The flashpoint arrives in early December.

Around December 4, 2025, Aave Labs announces a new integration with CoW Swap, replacing the previous swap provider, VeloraDEX, on the official Aave frontend. The stated goal is straightforward. Better pricing. Stronger MEV protection. A smoother experience for users.

On the surface, the upgrade looks positive.

Then questions emerge.

Between December 11 and 12, prominent Aave DAO delegate DeFi_EzR3aL reveals that swap fees generated by the new CoW Swap integration are no longer flowing to the DAO treasury. Instead, they are being routed to wallets controlled by Aave Labs.

That change matters. Historically, similar fees generated roughly $200,000 per week for the DAO. Over a year, that adds up to more than $10 million in protocol revenue.

The reaction is immediate. Community members describe the move as a “stealth privatization” of DAO income.

Marc Zeller, one of Aave’s most influential delegates and a leading voice within the Aave Chan Initiative, publicly calls out the change. His criticism sharpens the debate and pulls it into the spotlight.

Revenue alignment is no longer abstract. It is measurable. And it is now contested.

Governance Escalates From Debate To Confrontation

Between December 17 and 21, tensions boil over.

The governance forum fills with aggressive proposals. Some are incremental. Others are radical.

One idea gains particular attention. A proposal suggesting the DAO seize control of Aave Labs’ intellectual property, including code, branding, and historical revenue. The vision is clear. Make Aave Labs a subsidiary of the DAO.

Former Aave Labs CTO eboadom adds fuel to the discussion. He argues that key brand assets, including domains and trademarks, should belong to the DAO, noting that token holders funded much of Aave’s growth.

The debate is no longer about fees. It is about ownership.

At this stage, the governance process begins to feel adversarial rather than collaborative. Lines harden. Trust erodes. And markets start to notice.

Snapshot Vote Sparks Backlash And Whale Exit

On December 22, the situation takes an unexpected turn.

Stani Kulechov pushes a brand ownership proposal to a Snapshot vote scheduled between December 23 and 26. The proposal is based on a draft originally authored by Ernesto, but the move immediately draws criticism.

Ernesto publicly disapproves. He says his name was used without consent. He calls the timing “disgraceful,” noting that the vote lands during the holidays, when participation is typically low.

Marc Zeller raises additional concerns. He points to procedural interference and potential bias in how the proposal was advanced.

Then the market reacts.

Shortly after the controversy escalates, a whale unloads 230,350 AAVE tokens, worth roughly $37–38 million. The impact is swift. AAVE drops more than 10% within 24 hours.

Governance uncertainty has now translated directly into price action.

As explained by DeFi analysts tracking the situation, this was not panic selling. It was calculated exit risk.

As of now, the Snapshot vote is live.

Sentiment across the Aave community is deeply split. Some view the vote as a healthy step toward decentralization. A chance for token holders to assert control and demand alignment.

Others see it as rushed. A strategic power move by Aave Labs designed to defuse stronger demands and lock in favorable terms before broader participation can mobilize.

Adding another layer, prediction market data reportedly places the odds of the proposal passing at around 25%. For some, that represents a governance signal. For others, a speculative opportunity.

What is clear is that this fight is not really about $10 million per year in swap fees.

It is about whether DeFi protocols can truly be owned by token holders when development companies retain control over interfaces, brands, and revenue funnels.

The outcome at Aave will not stay contained. Other protocols operate under similar hybrid models. They are watching closely.

If token holders prevail, DAOs across DeFi may feel emboldened. If founders retain control, it may reinforce the limits of decentralization in practice.

For now, AAVE trades lower. Governance remains unresolved. And the industry is watching a live stress test of DeFi’s core promise.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Market Opportunity
AaveToken Logo
AaveToken Price(AAVE)
$155.67
$155.67$155.67
+0.56%
USD
AaveToken (AAVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns

Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns

The post Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/27 10:36
Burmese war amputees get free 3D-printed prostheses, thanks to Thailand-based group

Burmese war amputees get free 3D-printed prostheses, thanks to Thailand-based group

PROSTHETIC FEET. Silicon foot covers fitted with metal rods found in the prosthetic production unit in Mae Tao Clinic. A good prosthetic foot must absorb impact
Share
Rappler2025/12/27 10:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37