BENSALEM, Pa.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased WildermuthBENSALEM, Pa.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased Wildermuth

Law Offices of Howard G. Smith Encourages Wildermuth Fund (WESFX, WEFCX, WEIFX) Shareholders to Inquire About Securities Fraud Class Action

BENSALEM, Pa.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased Wildermuth Fund (“Wildermuth” or the “Fund”) (NASDAQ: WESFX, WEFCX, WEIFX) Class A (WESFX), Class C (WEFCX), and/or Class I (WEIFX) shares between November 1, 2020 through June 29, 2023, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Wildermuth investors have until December 29, 2025 to file a lead plaintiff motion.

IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN WILDERMUTH FUND (WESFX, WEFCX, WEIFX), CONTACT THE LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ONGOING SECURITIES FRAUD LAWSUIT.

Contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith to discuss your legal rights by email at howardsmith@howardsmithlaw.com, by telephone at (215) 638-4847 or visit our website at www.howardsmithlaw.com.

What Happened?

The Wildermuth Fund (the “Fund”) was a mutual fund which purported to provide investors access to a diversified portfolio of asset classes, including private equity. Wildermuth Advisory, LLC (the “Adviser”) served as the Fund’s investment adviser.

On June 29, 2023, the Fund announced that, based upon the recommendation of the Adviser, the Board of Trustees had approved a plan of liquidation for the Fund.

On November 1, 2023, as part of liquidation, the Board replaced the Advisor with a new investment advisor.

Following this replacement, the new investment advisor undertook a review of the Fund’s assets. It determined that the fair values of several of the Fund’s investments were significantly lower than previously calculated.

By 2024, the Company’s net asset value was revised to less than $2.00 per share, an 80% reduction from its prior levels.

What Is The Lawsuit About?

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants: (1) miscalculated the fair value of the Fund’s investments without sufficient, reliable evidence to support them; (2) failed to disclose that certain portfolio companies with questionable going concern value were being propped up with monthly cash infusions by the Fund; (3) intentionally inflated the Fund’s net asset value, leading to the payment of excessive and unearned advisory fees to the Adviser; and (4) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Fund’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Contact Us To Participate or Learn More:

If you purchased Wildermuth securities, have information or would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us:

Law Offices of Howard G. Smith,

3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112,

Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020,

Telephone: (215) 638-4847

Email: howardsmith@howardsmithlaw.com,

Visit our website at: www.howardsmithlaw.com.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contacts

Law Offices of Howard G. Smith

Howard G. Smith, Esquire

215-638-4847

howardsmith@howardsmithlaw.com
www.howardsmithlaw.com

Market Opportunity
Gravity Logo
Gravity Price(G)
$0.004359
$0.004359$0.004359
-0.04%
USD
Gravity (G) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Social engineering kost crypto miljarden in 2025

Social engineering kost crypto miljarden in 2025

De grootste dreiging voor crypto zit niet altijd in bugs of fouten in de code. Vaak gaat het fout bij mensen zelf. Nieuwe cijfers over 2025 laten zien hoe misleiding
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 03:01
Christmas Stocking Stuffers? Don't Ignore These Bitcoin Mining Stocks That Gave Impressive Returns In 2025

Christmas Stocking Stuffers? Don't Ignore These Bitcoin Mining Stocks That Gave Impressive Returns In 2025

Christmas brings cheer, cakes and cozy vibes, but it can also be a perfect time for kicking off investments you may not have considered before.read more
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 03:01
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37