TLDR Lithuania will block websites of unlicensed crypto firms after December 31, 2025. Crypto firms must apply for MiCA licenses or face fines, website blockingTLDR Lithuania will block websites of unlicensed crypto firms after December 31, 2025. Crypto firms must apply for MiCA licenses or face fines, website blocking

Lithuania to Take Action Against Unlicensed Crypto Firms After December 31

TLDR

  • Lithuania will block websites of unlicensed crypto firms after December 31, 2025.
  • Crypto firms must apply for MiCA licenses or face fines, website blocking, or jail time.
  • Over 370 crypto firms are registered in Lithuania; only 30 applied for the new license.
  • Providers not applying for a MiCA license must wind down operations by year-end.

Starting January 1, 2026, crypto-asset service providers in Lithuania must secure a MiCA license or face severe legal consequences. With over 370 companies registered, only 120 are actively operating, and just 30 have applied for the necessary licensing. The Bank of Lithuania has warned firms to comply or wind down operations by December 31, 2025, or risk fines, website blocks, and even criminal charges. Time is running out for unlicensed providers.

Lithuania to Enforce Legal Action on Unlicensed Crypto Providers

The Bank of Lithuania has issued a clear warning to all crypto-asset service providers: after December 31, 2025, operating without a MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) license will be considered illegal. The move aligns with the European Union’s broader regulation to ensure better oversight and protection of investors within the crypto industry.

As the deadline approaches, businesses in Lithuania offering crypto services, including exchanges and wallet operators, face significant pressure to comply. Those who fail to secure a MiCA license will be subject to penalties, which may include hefty fines, website blocking, public warnings, and even criminal prosecution.

The Push for Compliance

The Bank of Lithuania has made it clear that any crypto firms planning to continue operations in the country must be licensed under the new MiCA framework. Firms that do not intend to apply for the license are being urged to wind down operations before the deadline. The central bank emphasized the importance of taking early action to ensure a smooth transition and safeguard investors.

The MiCA regulation was introduced to bring clearer legal structures to the crypto industry, addressing concerns about transparency, accountability, and investor protection. The shift aims to prevent any legal loopholes in the crypto ecosystem that could potentially harm consumers or undermine market integrity.

While Lithuania has seen significant growth in the crypto sector, with over 370 companies registered, only about 120 are actively operating, according to the latest data from the Bank of Lithuania. As of mid-July, just 30 firms had applied for the new MiCA license, signaling that many providers may still be unprepared or unwilling to comply.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

After January 1, 2026, any firm continuing to operate without the required MiCA license will face serious legal consequences. These sanctions could range from fines and blocked websites to potential criminal charges. The penalties include the possibility of imprisonment for up to four years for individuals involved in illegal crypto operations.

The authorities have also indicated that they will be closely monitoring crypto companies, with the power to issue public warnings and pursue legal action if necessary. The Bank of Lithuania has made it clear that the aim of these measures is to ensure that firms operating in the crypto sector are following legal frameworks that protect investors and promote transparency.

Operational Challenges and Customer Communications

For those firms that decide to cease operations, it is critical to communicate effectively with customers. Providers are encouraged to offer clear instructions on how to withdraw or transfer funds and crypto-assets. Firms must also explain the process for exchanging crypto-assets for funds held with a custodian to ensure a seamless transition for their clients.

The central bank has also advised operators to provide specific timelines and instructions to customers regarding the closure of services. This will help prevent confusion and potential issues for investors who may be impacted by the transition. Providers that fail to clearly communicate these steps risk further penalties and damage to their reputation.

A Critical Transition for Lithuania’s Crypto Industry

With just under a year remaining before the deadline, the pressure is mounting on crypto firms in Lithuania to ensure compliance with MiCA licensing requirements. As the country moves to tighten its regulatory framework, businesses that fail to meet the new standards face the risk of being shut down or penalized. These measures aim to provide greater clarity and security in the crypto market, aligning Lithuania’s regulatory approach with European Union-wide standards.

While many firms may struggle to meet these demands, the Bank of Lithuania remains firm in its stance. The authorities emphasize that these changes are necessary to protect investors, ensure transparency, and promote the responsible growth of the crypto market in Lithuania.

The post Lithuania to Take Action Against Unlicensed Crypto Firms After December 31 appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Overtake Logo
Overtake Price(TAKE)
$0.31196
$0.31196$0.31196
-1.55%
USD
Overtake (TAKE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Quality is not about testing everything; quality is about testing what is most important.
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/26 16:05
US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

The plant is located in Ukraine and has been under Russian control since 2022, with its future management a key issue in peace talks.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 18:58
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00