Wintermute opposes AAVE’s governance proposal over unclear value capture and governance concerns, signaling a divide in the DeFi community. Wintermute founder EvgenyWintermute opposes AAVE’s governance proposal over unclear value capture and governance concerns, signaling a divide in the DeFi community. Wintermute founder Evgeny

Wintermute Opposes AAVE Proposal Over Token Value Capture Concerns

Wintermute opposes AAVE’s governance proposal over unclear value capture and governance concerns, signaling a divide in the DeFi community.

Wintermute founder Evgeny Gaevoy has announced that the firm will vote against the current AAVE governance proposal. The proposal, which seeks to transfer brand asset control to AAVE token holders, raises concerns about unclear value capture and governance mechanisms.

As an active participant in Aave’s governance and a significant investor in the AAVE token, Wintermute’s stance has drawn attention within the DeFi community. The firm’s opposition highlights ongoing tensions over how the protocol should manage and allocate its value.

Wintermute’s Concerns Over the AAVE Proposal

The main concern Wintermute has with the AAVE proposal is the lack of operational clarity. Gaevoy questioned how the transfer of brand control would work in practice.

He pointed out that the proposal did not specify who would manage the brand or how it would be monetized. This uncertainty around the operational details made Wintermute uncomfortable supporting the proposal.

Additionally, Gaevoy highlighted the misalignment between Aave Labs and a significant portion of AAVE token holders. The disagreement centers around who should benefit from the protocol’s generated value.

Gaevoy believes that this disconnect could negatively impact the growth of the token, especially if the issues remain unresolved. He argued that Aave Labs and the token holders must reach an agreement on these fundamental matters.

Political Maneuvering and Market Sentiment

Gaevoy also criticized the political maneuvering surrounding the vote. He pointed out that the public escalation of the situation has harmed AAVE’s market price. According to Gaevoy, the conflict and criticism have created unnecessary volatility and uncertainty.

The governance process, he suggested, should focus on solving core issues rather than fueling divisiveness.

While he acknowledged communication shortcomings from Aave founder Stani Kulechov, Gaevoy felt that the backlash against him was excessive. He noted that such public attacks were detrimental to the token’s value.

Gaevoy emphasized that the governance process should not rush decisions without clear execution details, as this could have long-term negative effects on the token’s market stability.

Related Reading: Wintermute Accused of Manipulating Market by Dumping $BTC and $ETH

Wintermute’s Voting Decision and Aave’s Future

Wintermute has confirmed that it will vote against the proposal due to the unclear value capture mechanism and governance concerns.

However, Gaevoy stressed that Wintermute still believes in the potential of AAVE and expects Aave Labs to address these issues in the future. He encouraged the team to engage in deeper discussions on the long-term solutions for token value capture.

The voting outcome will likely have significant implications for the future of Aave’s governance structure. A rejection of the proposal could lead to more open discussions about how to resolve the current issues.

On the other hand, if the proposal passes, it could further deepen the divide between Aave Labs and the token holders, delaying any potential resolution of the value capture challenges. The DeFi community will be watching closely as the situation unfolds.

The post Wintermute Opposes AAVE Proposal Over Token Value Capture Concerns appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
AaveToken Logo
AaveToken Price(AAVE)
$156.26
$156.26$156.26
-0.22%
USD
AaveToken (AAVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12
USDC Treasury mints 250 million new USDC on Solana

USDC Treasury mints 250 million new USDC on Solana

PANews reported on September 17 that according to Whale Alert , at 23:48 Beijing time, USDC Treasury minted 250 million new USDC (approximately US$250 million) on the Solana blockchain .
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:51
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52