Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) blasted Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) on Friday as a “Second Amendment imposter” for defending the Border Patrol killing of Alex Pretti, promptingRep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) blasted Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) on Friday as a “Second Amendment imposter” for defending the Border Patrol killing of Alex Pretti, prompting

‘Gaslighter’: MAGA lawmaker loses it when called out on 2nd Amendment hypocrisy

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) blasted Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) on Friday as a “Second Amendment imposter” for defending the Border Patrol killing of Alex Pretti, prompting a fiery response from Fine that included a slew of insults.

Pretti was pepper-sprayed, beaten and shot dead in Minneapolis over the weekend by Border Patrol officers, a killing that the Trump administration has defended even though Pretti was lawfully carrying a gun.

While Americans are permitted to legally carry firearms during peaceful protests – as many did during the COVID-19 pandemic to protest lockdowns – Fine took the side of the Trump administration and fiercely defended Pretti’s killing, despite his past remarks suggesting he was an uncompromising defender of the Second Amendment.

“Second Amendment impostor and hypocrite Randy Fine has no problem with federal agents confiscating a citizen’s lawful firearm and then shooting him dead with ten bullets ,” Raskin wrote in a social media post on X.

“You don’t lose your Second Amendment rights because you’re lawfully exercising your First Amendment rights. Fine isn’t a constitutional patriot – he’s a Trump toady and autocratic sycophant.”

Fine couldn’t help but respond to Raskin’s criticisms, launching his own slew of attacks on the Maryland Democrat.

“You’re an idiot, and worse, a gaslighter. Pretti engaged physically with law enforcement while carrying a gun, something every responsible gun owner knows not to do,” Fine wrote in a response to Raskin’s remarks.

“This after he spit on them, physically attacked them, and called on them to hurt him. When you FA, you FO. Your fetish for illegal immigrants over the safety of Americans is sick, disgusting, and shameful.”

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

The post U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime 18 September 2025 | 04:05 A Colorado judge has brought closure to one of the state’s most unusual cryptocurrency scandals, declaring INDXcoin to be a fraudulent operation and ordering its founders, Denver pastor Eli Regalado and his wife Kaitlyn, to repay $3.34 million. The ruling, issued by District Court Judge Heidi L. Kutcher, came nearly two years after the couple persuaded hundreds of people to invest in their token, promising safety and abundance through a Christian-branded platform called the Kingdom Wealth Exchange. The scheme ran between June 2022 and April 2023 and drew in more than 300 participants, many of them members of local church networks. Marketing materials portrayed INDXcoin as a low-risk gateway to prosperity, yet the project unraveled almost immediately. The exchange itself collapsed within 24 hours of launch, wiping out investors’ money. Despite this failure—and despite an auditor’s damning review that gave the system a “0 out of 10” for security—the Regalados kept presenting it as a solid opportunity. Colorado regulators argued that the couple’s faith-based appeal was central to the fraud. Securities Commissioner Tung Chan said the Regalados “dressed an old scam in new technology” and used their standing within the Christian community to convince people who had little knowledge of crypto. For him, the case illustrates how modern digital assets can be exploited to replicate classic Ponzi-style tactics under a different name. Court filings revealed where much of the money ended up: luxury goods, vacations, jewelry, a Range Rover, high-end clothing, and even dental procedures. In a video that drew worldwide attention earlier this year, Eli Regalado admitted the funds had been spent, explaining that a portion went to taxes while the remainder was used for a home renovation he claimed was divinely inspired. The judgment not only confirms that INDXcoin qualifies as a…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:14
What is the 80 20 rule for Airbnb? A practical guide for hosts

What is the 80 20 rule for Airbnb? A practical guide for hosts

This article explains the 80 20 idea as a practical heuristic for Airbnb hosts and shows how it links to realistic, low-cash ways people gain control of short-term
Share
Coinstats2026/01/31 08:42
Why ZKP Ranks Among the Best New Cryptos to Buy With Fair Design and Private Compute

Why ZKP Ranks Among the Best New Cryptos to Buy With Fair Design and Private Compute

While many investors focus on the latest trending tokens, ZKP has been steadily building a foundation with lasting value. By combining real hardware, verifiable
Share
Techbullion2026/01/31 09:00