CFTC Commissioner Michael Selig has already taken a strong stand of support for prediction markets. Illustration: Gwen P; Source: Shutterstock, Mike SeligCFTC Commissioner Michael Selig has already taken a strong stand of support for prediction markets. Illustration: Gwen P; Source: Shutterstock, Mike Selig

Prediction market bills are flooding Washington. Are they really necessary?

2026/03/23 23:58
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

A version of this story appeared in The Guidance newsletter on March 23. Sign up here.

Hey all, Liam here.

Prediction markets aren’t just keeping speculators busy — they’re becoming top of mind in Washington.

A slew of new bills is flooding the US capital, all targeting various aspects of the booming prediction market industry.

And all of them were introduced in the last three months.

Ritchie Torres, a New York Representative, presented the Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026 in January to block federal officials from trading on prediction markets.

In February, Nevada Representative Dina Titus introduced the Fair Markets and Sports Integrity Act, which seeks to ban outright sports betting on prediction markets.

On March 5, a bill from Democratic senators Jeff Merkley and Amy Klobuchar would formally prohibit senior members of the executive branch from trading on prediction markets entirely.

Another bipartisan bill introduced on March 6 by Representatives Blake Moore of Utah and Salud Carbajal of California aims to rein in insider trading involving sensitive military secrets and democratic processes.

And finally, on Tuesday, California Representative Mike Levin and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff issued the DEATH BETS Act that would ban markets that reference terrorism, assassination, war or the death of an individual.

While they all take on the latest wagering boom, Yesha Yadav, a professor of law and associate dean at Vanderbilt Law School, says these bills zero in on two very key worries.

First, protecting the large number of retail users wagering on these platforms. Second, lawmakers are clearly interested in thwarting insiders from potentially using sensitive information to profit from geopolitical conflicts.

“The most pressing concern here is ensuring that these markets are viewed as safe and capable of protecting participants from predatory traders,” Yadav said.

Same laws, new CFTC

Polymarket and Kalshi are quickly becoming household names.

Last month, Polymarket and Kalshi posted notional volumes of $7.9 billion and $10.4 billion, respectively. Major fintech platforms, such as Robinhood, as well as traditional sports betting companies, like DraftKings, are all diverting resources to roll out equivalent offerings.

The two platforms are also different in one key way.

What people usually think of as Polymarket is its global, offshore platform, which is actually forbidden in the US. American users who attempt to access the offshore version with a virtual private network can even have their accounts revoked.

The company is slowly rolling out a US version after it acquired the derivatives exchange and clearinghouse QCEX for $112 million in 2025.

Kalshi, on the other hand, is regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

That’s important because some academics argue that most of the bills circulating in Washington would be redundant. The CFTC already has insider trading laws baked into its mandate, and what they are actually targeting is an offshore platform.

Plus, Michael Selig, the new commissioner, has been very clear that prediction markets already fall well within the agency’s jurisdiction.

“The Commodity Exchange Act gives CFTC authority to regulate these markets however it determines is in the public interest,” Harry Crane, a professor of statistics at Rutgers University, told DL News. “That’s a big reason why the primary examples that are being cited are not from CFTC-regulated markets.”

Others agree that the law may be the same, but prediction markets have exploded in popularity in the last two years.

Likewise, the Commodity Exchange Act may be too vague to effectively rein in the emergent behaviour on these platforms.

“Whatever the law was two years ago, it is the same law today,” Andrew Verstein, a professor of law at UCLA, told DL News.

“But prediction markets have exploded in the meantime. Something has to change on the legal side, both to authorise the market if we want to bless it, and to address its new challenges.”

Liam Kelly is DL News’ Berlin-based DeFi correspondent. Have a tip? Get in touch at liam@dlnews.com.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Vitalik Buterin lays out new Ethereum roadmap at EDCON

Vitalik Buterin lays out new Ethereum roadmap at EDCON

The post Vitalik Buterin lays out new Ethereum roadmap at EDCON appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. At EDCON 2025 in Osaka, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin delivered fresh details of Ethereum’s technical roadmap, delineating both short-term scaling goals and longer-term protocol transformations. The immediate priority, according to slides from the presentation, is scaling at the L1 level by raising the gas limit while maintaining decentralization. Tools such as block-level access lists, ZK-EVMs, gas repricing, and slot optimization were highlighted as means to improve throughput and efficiency. A central theme of the presentation was privacy, divided into protections for on-chain “writes” (transactions, voting, DeFi operations) and “reads” (retrieving blockchain state). Write privacy could be achieved through client-side zero-knowledge proofs, encrypted voting, and mixnet-based transaction relays. Read privacy efforts include trusted execution environments, private information retrieval techniques, dummy queries to obscure access patterns, and partial state nodes that reveal only necessary data. These measures aim to reduce information leakage across both ends of user interaction. In the medium term, Ethereum’s focus shifts to cross-Layer-2 interoperability. Vitalik described trustless L2 asset transfers, proof aggregation, and faster settlement mechanisms as key milestones toward a seamless rollup ecosystem. Faster slots and stronger finality, supported by techniques like erasure coding and three-stage finalization (3SF), are also in scope to enhance responsiveness and security. The roadmap also includes Stage 2 rollup advancements to strengthen verification efficiency, alongside a call for broader community participation to help build and maintain these improvements. The long-term “Lean Ethereum” blueprint emphasizes security, simplicity and optimization, with ambitions for quantum-resistant cryptography, formal verification of the protocol, and adoption of ideal primitives for hashing, signatures, and zero-knowledge proofs. Buterin stressed that these improvements are not just for scalability but to make Ethereum a stable, trustworthy foundation for the broader decentralized ecosystem. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:22
WADESK Just Dropped the Ultimate WASender Free Tool for Marketers

WADESK Just Dropped the Ultimate WASender Free Tool for Marketers

Marketing budgets are tight these days. If you are like most small business owners or digital marketers, you are constantly juggling five different expensive subscriptions
Share
Techbullion2026/03/24 18:46
The old and weak president is losing — because he’s old and weak

The old and weak president is losing — because he’s old and weak

I was surprised. Though Donald Trump is the weakest president of my lifetime, in terms of principle and character, I didn't think he would set himself up to prove
Share
Alternet2026/03/24 19:25