The post What it means for seniors, research, stocks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tarek Adieh, of Tampa, Florida, looks at cannabis flower from wholesalerThe post What it means for seniors, research, stocks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tarek Adieh, of Tampa, Florida, looks at cannabis flower from wholesaler

What it means for seniors, research, stocks

Tarek Adieh, of Tampa, Florida, looks at cannabis flower from wholesaler Dep Kings at CHAMPS Trade Show at the Palmer Events Center Thursday, Sept. 11, 2025.

Jay Jannar | Hearst Newspapers | Getty Images

President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order this week that would broadly expand access to cannabis. Industry advocates, executives and researchers who spoke to CNBC said the changes would come with big implications for both consumers and the health care industry.

Trump said Monday he’s “strongly” considering an executive order that would reclassify pot as a Schedule III drug under the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, which would place cannabis alongside Tylenol with codeine, rather than Schedule I with the likes of heroin and LSD, as it’s classified now. The order would also authorize a pilot program allowing Medicare to cover cannabis products for seniors.

The proposal is expected to apply specifically to cannabidiol products, better known as CBD, aimed at treating chronic pain, sleep deprivation, and other age-related ailments, said Shawn Hauser, a partner at cannabis-focused law firm Vicente LLP.

CBD has spiked in popularity in recent years, moving into the mainstream via canned cocktails and body lotions, but has yet to win full-throated backing from federal drug regulators.

“I expect the executive order will make clear what kind of cannabinoids are covered, that they have to come from a federally legal source,” Hauser told CNBC.

While many in the cannabis industry view the shift to Schedule III as a done deal, the inclusion of a controversial Medicare provision adds an extra wrinkle that could embed cannabis-derived products into the U.S. health-care system, despite limited clinic evidence of their efficacy, some experts told CNBC.

Insiders like Hauser expect the final order to define legal cannabinoids, administrative methods and a framework for Food and Drug Administration oversight.

“A lot of people want to see it, the reclassification, because it leads to tremendous amounts of research that can’t be done unless you reclassify,” Trump told reporters Monday. “So we are looking at that very strongly.”

Rescheduling and Medicare coverage are likely to trigger new investments from institutional capital and investors that typically follow federal insurance coverage to big pharmaceutical companies, said Timothy Seymour, founder and chief investment officer of Seymour Asset Management and a CNBC contributor.

“The valuation of the sector will be worth a lot more because institutional investors will be allowed in, will have access and will have liquidity, and exchanges will trade them,” Seymour told CNBC. “That immediately could double or triple the sector.”

The push for reclassification comes as a 2024 report found that more Americans reported using marijuana daily, or near-daily, than reported drinking alcohol at the same frequency. It was the first time the share of daily use had flipped in marijuana’s favor, based on analysis of 40 years of data from Carnegie Mellon University.

A budtender organizes and inventories marijuana flower at The Health Center, a medical cannabis and recreational marijuana dispensary in Denver.

Vince Chandler | Denver Post | Getty Images

Medicare disagreements

The Medicare initiative is being championed by billionaire Howard Kessler, a financier and longtime Trump ally who founded The Commonwealth Project in 2019. The organization says it advocates for senior care, including through cannabis use.

Kessler and advocates like Hauser have urged the administration to bypass typical FDA hurdles — like yearslong clinical trials — and use a pilot program to gather real-world data on the safety and outcomes of cannabinoids in the senior population.

Kessler did not respond to a request for comment. The White House also did not respond to a request for comment.

In September, cannabis companies’ stocks rallied on optimism that Trump would soon weigh in after he shared a Commonwealth Project video on Truth Social that branded CBD coverage as “the most important senior health initiative of the century.”

However, the Medicare proposal has drawn scrutiny, even from other Trump allies.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has raised concerns about the cost and liability of such a program, the Washington Post first reported, while FDA officials argue that reimbursing Americans for non-agency-approved treatments would be unprecedented.

Beyond the politics, the scientific case for medical cannabis remains contentious.

Research shifts

The FDA has so far only approved CBD-based drug Epidiolex to treat rare forms of epilepsy. This narrow approval reflects both regulators’ caution and the fact that high-quality clinical trials are still limited for most of the other conditions where cannabis is being promoted.

Critics warn that a Medicare pilot program could endanger seniors, a demographic that often takes multiple daily medications. A recent FDA-funded study suggested that prolonged CBD use may cause liver toxicity and interfere with other life-saving medications.

“It’s not at all based on science. This is all based on money, and it’s egregious. That’s not the way we make medical decisions,” said Meg Haney, director of the Cannabis Research Laboratory at Columbia University. “[Kessler], who’s a buddy with the president … can make a lot of money selling something that has no evidence behind it.”

Other research has cast doubt on cannabis’ efficacy entirely, suggesting it may not be effective for many of the conditions targeted by the proposed pilot, Haney said.

For example, a 2023 review of 134 studies involving adults age 50 and older found medical cannabis to have inconsistent outcomes for improving conditions like end-stage cancer and dementia. The review also found more frequent links to harms including depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment and injury.

Rescheduling cannabis would, however, ease barriers to conducting clinical trials that experts say have historically stifled scientific research.

“Medical research has effectively been under lock and key,” said Ryan Vandrey, a Johns Hopkins University professor who helps run its Cannabis Science Lab. “Schedule I makes large, placebo-controlled trials incredibly difficult. Without that data, policymakers are being asked to make decisions in the dark.”

Investing potential

For investors, the specific terms of rescheduling are critical.

Rescheduling would improve growers’ access to banking and financial services because it would lift certain IRS tax restrictions, which bar cannabis businesses from deducting standard expenses.

The economic backdrop is already shifting: The annual value of the U.S. cannabis production jumped 40% last year from the previous year, according to the Department of Agriculture. The global market for cannabis-derived products is projected to hit $160 billion global market by 2032, according to Grand View Research.

Rumors of rescheduling and a possible pilot program helped shares of weed producers Tilray Brands and Canopy Growth jump 44% and 52%, respectively, on Friday.

As Seymour described it, Medicare coverage and federal insurance involvement is the “holy grail” that could unlock institutional capital.

A Schedule III classification could also help legitimize the sector for institutional investors who have been hesitant to wade in, paving the way for more stocks to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq and shifting valuations from retail sentiment to fundamental cash flows.

“The Schedule I classification is what has held back a lot of institutional investors,” Seymour said. “Having to go out and tell their shareholders … that they own a company who’s selling something that is on a par with heroin, LSD or cocaine … is kind of a tough thing to swallow.”

Stock chart icon

Stocks of largest market cap cannabis companies in the U.S.

Business risks

If cannabis shifts to a reimbursable prescription drug model or federal legality, the category could attract interest from major pharmaceutical companies and distribution could eventually migrate from state-licensed dispensaries to national pharmacy chains like CVS and Walgreens.

That could spell trouble for smaller weed businesses.

Already, large pharmaceutical companies have the deep pockets needed to fund the multi-year, double-blind clinical trials required for FDA-approved drugs — a barrier to entry that few current cannabis operators can surmount.

However, Seymour views Medicare coverage as a catalyst for merger and acquisition activity rather than an immediate death knell.

“You are going to see more consolidation in the sector,” Seymour said. “Smaller companies that have good businesses, that are profitable … are probably going to be seen as targets.”

Meanwhile, Green Thumb Industries CEO Ben Kovler foresees more competition among pharmaceutical companies and cannabis companies to achieve medical breakthroughs.

“The pharma sector, in the past, has been a major lobbyist against [cannabis] because it is a threat,” Seymour added. “Therefore, yes, it’s a huge opportunity for pharma.”

— CNBC’s Brandon Gomez contributed to this report.

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/16/trump-medicare-pot-seniors-marijuana-reclassification.html

Market Opportunity
LooksRare Logo
LooksRare Price(LOOKS)
$0.001224
$0.001224$0.001224
-0.48%
USD
LooksRare (LOOKS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

BitcoinWorld Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims In a significant move for cryptocurrency security, Trust Wallet has committed
Share
bitcoinworld2025/12/26 17:40
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

CZ hinted at possible insider involvement in the Trust Wallet incident while assuring users that their funds would be reimbursed.
Share
CryptoPotato2025/12/26 16:48