Xen Baynham-Herd, Head of Global Growth at Base at Coinbase, sees on-chain infrastructure not as a niche experiment but as the foundation of the next internet. Xen Baynham-Herd, Head of Global Growth at Base at Coinbase, sees on-chain infrastructure not as a niche experiment but as the foundation of the next internet.

Xen Baynham-Herd on Building Base: From Experimental L2s to Real On-chain Adoption

Xen Baynham-Herd, Head of Global Growth at Base at Coinbase, sees on-chain infrastructure not as a niche experiment but as the foundation of the next internet.

Speaking about Base, Coinbase’s Layer-2 network, Baynham-Herd explains what success really means for Base, how the builder environment is maturing, and why user experience—not grants or hype—will determine who wins.

What Success for Base Looks Like—and What Failure Would Mean

In an interview with CryptoNews, Baynham-Herd describes Base as a key piece in unlocking an on-chain future for the internet. In three to five years, success would mean that using on-chain applications feels as natural as using any app on a smartphone.

Users shouldn’t have to think about blockchain mechanics—they should simply experience speed, safety, and familiarity, while remaining fully in control of their digital lives.

Failure, by contrast, would be an inability to make on-chain experiences intuitive and democratic. If decentralised infrastructure cannot feel open, trustworthy, and seamless at scale, it risks remaining a niche rather than becoming the default digital layer of the internet.

Where Base Refuses to Compete in the L2 Arms Race

While many Layer-2 networks compete aggressively on fees and raw throughput, Baynham-Herd says Base’s differentiation lies elsewhere. Base already offers sub-second speeds and sub-cent fees, but performance alone is not the end goal.

Instead, Base prioritises user experience, distribution, and deep product integration. Its long-term success will be measured by trust, convenience, and scale—factors that matter far more to mainstream users than marginal fee reductions.

The Biggest Mistake Builders Make on Base

According to Baynham-Herd, the most common mistake founders make is failing to obsess over user experience. The strongest teams focus relentlessly on building products that attract and retain new users—not just crypto natives, but people entering the ecosystem for the first time.

He advises founders to ignore short-term noise and focus on creating applications that genuinely delight users. Sustainable growth, he argues, comes from solving real problems, not from chasing trends.

From Experimentation to Durable On-chain Products

Over the past 12 months, Baynham-Herd has seen a shift toward more serious teams committing to long-term development on Base. These builders are no longer just testing ideas—they are designing products meant to endure.

A key change is how teams think about wallets and identity. Wallets are evolving from simple key-management tools into representations of on-chain identity—spaces where participation, creation, and connection coexist. This shift is reshaping how products are designed and how users engage on-chain.

Why Regulation and Adoption Metrics Matter More Than Token Prices

Being closely linked to a regulated company like Coinbase is, in Baynham-Herd’s view, a strategic advantage rather than a limitation. Regulation provides transparency and consumer protection, which serious builders increasingly value as on-chain products reach mainstream audiences.

He also urges observers to look beyond token price movements when assessing adoption. Real traction, he says, is reflected in user growth and app engagement—not in whether a coin is going up or down. Durable on-chain businesses are built by teams whose users show up without incentives, driven by genuine belief in the product and its long-term value.

Market Opportunity
XEN Crypto Logo
XEN Crypto Price(XEN)
$0.00000001079
$0.00000001079$0.00000001079
-0.91%
USD
XEN Crypto (XEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

BitcoinWorld Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims In a significant move for cryptocurrency security, Trust Wallet has committed
Share
bitcoinworld2025/12/26 17:40
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

CZ hinted at possible insider involvement in the Trust Wallet incident while assuring users that their funds would be reimbursed.
Share
CryptoPotato2025/12/26 16:48