The post Hoskinson Blames Account Models for Address Poisoning appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Trader loses $50 million in USDT through an address poisoningThe post Hoskinson Blames Account Models for Address Poisoning appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Trader loses $50 million in USDT through an address poisoning

Hoskinson Blames Account Models for Address Poisoning

  • Trader loses $50 million in USDT through an address poisoning attack.
  • Charles Hoskinson states that UTXO blockchains like Cardano resist poisoning attacks.
  • Crypto thefts surpassed $3.4 billion in 2025, according to Chainalysis data.

Digital asset security remains the primary challenge facing the cryptocurrency sector as it enters 2026. An unnamed trader lost nearly $50 million in USDT to an address poisoning scam, raising questions about infrastructure resilience.

The victim had operated their wallet for approximately two years, primarily conducting USDT transfers. The trader followed standard security practices by sending a test transaction of 50 USDT before executing the larger transfer. Despite this precaution, the attack succeeded through social engineering tactics.

Address Poisoning Exploits Fundamental Design Flaws

Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano, stated that the vulnerability stems from architectural choices in account-based blockchain systems. Ethereum and other EVM-compatible chains display addresses as free-form strings in transaction histories. Wallets encourage users to copy addresses from previous transactions. This creates opportunities for attackers to inject malicious addresses.

Hoskinson argued that UTXO-based blockchains like Bitcoin and Cardano are not affected by this attack vector. These systems consume existing transaction outputs and create new ones with each transfer. This prevents the address reuse patterns that enable poisoning attacks. UTXO wallets select transaction outputs explicitly rather than copying destination addresses from account histories.

“A persistent account state to visually poison does not exist” in UTXO models, Hoskinson noted on X. One user disagreed, stating that address poisoning results from user error when copying incorrect addresses from blockchain explorers. Hoskinson responded that account abstraction and smart wallet standards make the problem worse rather than better.

Annual Theft Reaches Highest Levels Since 2022

Data from Chainalysis shows cryptocurrency hacks exceeded $3.4 billion in 2025, surpassing 2024 levels. The Bybit breach in February accounted for approximately $1.4 billion, making it the largest single cryptocurrency theft on record. North Korea-linked actors were attributed with responsibility for that attack.

The $50 million address poisoning incident is a growing trend of attacks targeting traders with large holdings. These schemes rely on exploiting human behavior rather than breaking cryptographic security or finding smart contract vulnerabilities.

Projects building on account-based models face pressure to implement additional safeguards against social engineering. Smart wallet standards and account abstraction introduce complexity that may create new vulnerability vectors. Meanwhile, UTXO-based chains position their architectural choices as inherent security advantages.

Related: What Prices to Expect for XRP, BTC, ETH, and ADA on Christmas?

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/hoskinson-blames-account-based-blockchains-for-50m-address-poisoning-scam/

Market Opportunity
Wink Logo
Wink Price(LIKE)
$0,003001
$0,003001$0,003001
-0,13%
USD
Wink (LIKE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

The post Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X account @SaniExp, which belongs to the founder of the Timechain Index explorer, has published data showing that a dormant BTC wallet was activated after hibernating for six years. However, it was set up 13 years ago, according to the tweet — the time when Satoshi Nakamoto’s shadow was still casting itself around, so to speak. The X post states that the tweet belongs to infamous early Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, which suffered from a major hack in the early 2010s, and last year it began paying out compensation to clients who lost their crypto in that hack. The deadline was eventually extended to October 2025. Mt. Gox’s wallet with 1,000 BTC reactivated The above-mentioned data source shared a screenshot from the Timechain Index explorer, showing multiple transactions marked as confirmed and moving a total of 1,000 Bitcoins. This amount of crypto is valued at $116,195,100 at the time of the initiated transaction. Last year, Mt. Gox began to move the remains of its gargantuan funds to pay out compensations to its creditors. Earlier this year, it also made several massive transactions to partner exchanges to distribute funds to Mt. Gox investors. All of the compensations were promised to be paid out by Oct. 31, 2025. The aforementioned transaction is likely preparation for another payout. The exchange was hacked for several years due to multiple unnoticed security breaches, and in 2014, when the site went offline, 744,408 Bitcoins were reported stolen. Source: https://u.today/satoshi-era-mtgoxs-1000-bitcoin-wallet-suddenly-reactivated
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 10:18
Zycus Launches Industry-First AI Adoption Index to Measure Real-World AI Maturity in Procurement

Zycus Launches Industry-First AI Adoption Index to Measure Real-World AI Maturity in Procurement

Princeton, NJ | Dec 26th, 2025 — Zycus, a global leader in AI-powered Source-to-Pay (S2P) solutions, today announced the launch of the AI Adoption Index for Procurement
Share
Techbullion2025/12/26 17:57
Soccer Replica Jerseys – Kits, Customization, and Best Practices for Caring for Them

Soccer Replica Jerseys – Kits, Customization, and Best Practices for Caring for Them

Today’s soccer jersey is more than just athletic clothing; it is a representation of loyalty, a statement of fashion, and an example of technical development. The
Share
Techbullion2025/12/26 18:04