TLDR: Hypervault allegedly stole $6.3M in crypto, leaving users with empty smart contracts. Nick Olsen, founder, reportedly deleted all social media channels after the incident. Affected users are advised to revoke wallet permissions immediately to protect funds. Blockchain transactions are irreversible, making recovery of lost funds impossible. The crypto community is sounding the alarm after [...] The post Hypervault Rug Pulls $6.3M From Investors, Founder Allegedly Disappears appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR: Hypervault allegedly stole $6.3M in crypto, leaving users with empty smart contracts. Nick Olsen, founder, reportedly deleted all social media channels after the incident. Affected users are advised to revoke wallet permissions immediately to protect funds. Blockchain transactions are irreversible, making recovery of lost funds impossible. The crypto community is sounding the alarm after [...] The post Hypervault Rug Pulls $6.3M From Investors, Founder Allegedly Disappears appeared first on Blockonomi.

Hypervault Rug Pulls $6.3M From Investors, Founder Allegedly Disappears

TLDR:

  • Hypervault allegedly stole $6.3M in crypto, leaving users with empty smart contracts.
  • Nick Olsen, founder, reportedly deleted all social media channels after the incident.
  • Affected users are advised to revoke wallet permissions immediately to protect funds.
  • Blockchain transactions are irreversible, making recovery of lost funds impossible.

The crypto community is sounding the alarm after allegations emerged that Hypervault’s founder, Nick Olsen from Sweden, stole millions from investors. Social media users, including @hypingbull, reported that Hypervault’s smart contracts now hold no assets. 

The controversy has caused panic among users who trusted the platform for crypto investment. Investors are scrambling to safeguard their wallets, as blockchain rules make reversing transactions impossible. Community members are rallying online to warn others and trace the alleged culprit.

According to tweets shared by @hypingbull, multiple users, including @theHYPEconomist, had prior discussions with Olsen before investing. The total value lost is reported to be around $6.3 million in various cryptocurrencies. 

The affected wallets are now empty, and the platform’s website shows no remaining funds. Investors are being urged to act quickly to revoke permissions on any connected wallets to prevent further loss.

Hypervault Crypto Losses Shake Investor Confidence

Following the alleged rug pull, Hypervault deleted all major social channels. Twitter and Discord accounts linked to the project no longer exist, limiting communication. Users expressed frustration, noting that the lack of transparency left them exposed. 

Security experts advise caution when interacting with unaudited smart contracts in decentralized finance platforms.

Community members are sharing contact information linked to Olsen, including the email rizwan.bizdev@gmail.com. Some investors are attempting to connect through social platforms to document the alleged scam. 

Despite these efforts, the decentralized nature of blockchain means recovering lost funds is highly unlikely. Analysts warn that such incidents highlight the risks of investing in unverified crypto projects.

Steps Users Can Take After a Crypto Scam

Experts recommend revoking wallet permissions immediately for any platform linked to Hypervault. This limits potential future losses even if funds cannot be retrieved. 

Investors are reminded to use audited contracts and verified platforms to prevent similar outcomes. Community discussion threads are growing as users exchange advice and updates on possible recovery avenues.

The post Hypervault Rug Pulls $6.3M From Investors, Founder Allegedly Disappears appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game

Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game

The post Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief A Singapore-based man has
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 05:17