Decentralised finance protocols are passing on revenue to holders of their tokens at a record rate as they work to earn investors’ trust, but it could be a waste of money.That’s according to a new report from crypto market maker Keyrock, which looked at token buybacks, one of the most popular ways for protocols to tie their success to the price of the tokens they issue.Keyrock found that the top 12 revenue-distributing protocols spent almost $800 million on token buybacks and other revenue-sharing activities in July, a more than 400% increase since the start of 2024. “Much like public companies that use buybacks to signal long-term commitment and instill investor trust, crypto teams leverage them to enhance token value and communicate conviction in the project’s future,” Amir Hajian, the Keyrock researcher who wrote the report, said. Token buybacks have become increasingly popular in recent months.The idea is that buybacks — paid for with fees generated from the protocol’s users — will tie the value of a token to the success of its associated DeFi protocol, regardless of how the broader crypto market trades.In other words, the more profit a protocol generates, the more it will spend buying back its token, increasing its market value.Poor use of capital? It’s not clear how effective token buybacks are, however.“Buybacks are broken, but can be improved,” Hajian said in the report, adding that many programmes overspend when prices are high and underspend in downturns, when they matter most.Buybacks can also be inefficient because they may divert funds from marketing and growth initiatives, Hajian added.It’s not just Keyrock making that case. In March, a report from crypto research firm Messari also argued that buybacks are a poor use of capital. “Our analysis finds no clear evidence that the market rewards these initiatives, as token performance remains driven by metrics growth and narrative formation,” Sunny Shi, the report’s author, said.Still, the perception that buybacks help shore up token prices is powerful. Perpetual futures exchange Hyperliquid has made token buybacks an integral part of its strategy. Many investors equate Hyperliquid’s buyback programme with the strong performance of its HYPE token, which has soared 500% since its November 2024 launch. Seeing this success, others, such as the top lending protocol Aave, are also implementing buyback programmes. Uncertain valueWhile DeFi tokens soared in 2021 as excitement around the sector peaked, many have since underperformed as the hype died down and investors began to question their high valuations. Even the tokens of successful DeFi protocols, like liquid staking protocol Lido and credit protocol Sky, are trading well below their 2021 highs, despite their revenues increasing significantly since then.“Tokens do not guarantee dividends, confer legal rights, or offer the clarity of earnings metrics,” the Keyrock report said. “The link between protocol performance and tokenholder value is therefore indirect and often uncertain.”Buybacks are an attempt to ground token valuation in something tangible, such as a percentage of the protocol’s total revenue.Despite their issues, the data shows buybacks aren’t a bad idea altogether, according to the Keyrock report.“Disciplined programmes, grounded in revenue stability, treasury strength, and valuation awareness, can reinforce alignment and credibility,” Hajian said.Tim Craig is DL News’ Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@dlnews.com.Decentralised finance protocols are passing on revenue to holders of their tokens at a record rate as they work to earn investors’ trust, but it could be a waste of money.That’s according to a new report from crypto market maker Keyrock, which looked at token buybacks, one of the most popular ways for protocols to tie their success to the price of the tokens they issue.Keyrock found that the top 12 revenue-distributing protocols spent almost $800 million on token buybacks and other revenue-sharing activities in July, a more than 400% increase since the start of 2024. “Much like public companies that use buybacks to signal long-term commitment and instill investor trust, crypto teams leverage them to enhance token value and communicate conviction in the project’s future,” Amir Hajian, the Keyrock researcher who wrote the report, said. Token buybacks have become increasingly popular in recent months.The idea is that buybacks — paid for with fees generated from the protocol’s users — will tie the value of a token to the success of its associated DeFi protocol, regardless of how the broader crypto market trades.In other words, the more profit a protocol generates, the more it will spend buying back its token, increasing its market value.Poor use of capital? It’s not clear how effective token buybacks are, however.“Buybacks are broken, but can be improved,” Hajian said in the report, adding that many programmes overspend when prices are high and underspend in downturns, when they matter most.Buybacks can also be inefficient because they may divert funds from marketing and growth initiatives, Hajian added.It’s not just Keyrock making that case. In March, a report from crypto research firm Messari also argued that buybacks are a poor use of capital. “Our analysis finds no clear evidence that the market rewards these initiatives, as token performance remains driven by metrics growth and narrative formation,” Sunny Shi, the report’s author, said.Still, the perception that buybacks help shore up token prices is powerful. Perpetual futures exchange Hyperliquid has made token buybacks an integral part of its strategy. Many investors equate Hyperliquid’s buyback programme with the strong performance of its HYPE token, which has soared 500% since its November 2024 launch. Seeing this success, others, such as the top lending protocol Aave, are also implementing buyback programmes. Uncertain valueWhile DeFi tokens soared in 2021 as excitement around the sector peaked, many have since underperformed as the hype died down and investors began to question their high valuations. Even the tokens of successful DeFi protocols, like liquid staking protocol Lido and credit protocol Sky, are trading well below their 2021 highs, despite their revenues increasing significantly since then.“Tokens do not guarantee dividends, confer legal rights, or offer the clarity of earnings metrics,” the Keyrock report said. “The link between protocol performance and tokenholder value is therefore indirect and often uncertain.”Buybacks are an attempt to ground token valuation in something tangible, such as a percentage of the protocol’s total revenue.Despite their issues, the data shows buybacks aren’t a bad idea altogether, according to the Keyrock report.“Disciplined programmes, grounded in revenue stability, treasury strength, and valuation awareness, can reinforce alignment and credibility,” Hajian said.Tim Craig is DL News’ Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@dlnews.com.

Why DeFi teams dropped record $800m on ‘broken’ buyback programmes

2025/10/23 22:09
3 min read

Decentralised finance protocols are passing on revenue to holders of their tokens at a record rate as they work to earn investors’ trust, but it could be a waste of money.

That’s according to a new report from crypto market maker Keyrock, which looked at token buybacks, one of the most popular ways for protocols to tie their success to the price of the tokens they issue.

Keyrock found that the top 12 revenue-distributing protocols spent almost $800 million on token buybacks and other revenue-sharing activities in July, a more than 400% increase since the start of 2024.

“Much like public companies that use buybacks to signal long-term commitment and instill investor trust, crypto teams leverage them to enhance token value and communicate conviction in the project’s future,” Amir Hajian, the Keyrock researcher who wrote the report, said.

Token buybacks have become increasingly popular in recent months.

The idea is that buybacks — paid for with fees generated from the protocol’s users — will tie the value of a token to the success of its associated DeFi protocol, regardless of how the broader crypto market trades.

In other words, the more profit a protocol generates, the more it will spend buying back its token, increasing its market value.

Poor use of capital?

It’s not clear how effective token buybacks are, however.

“Buybacks are broken, but can be improved,” Hajian said in the report, adding that many programmes overspend when prices are high and underspend in downturns, when they matter most.

Buybacks can also be inefficient because they may divert funds from marketing and growth initiatives, Hajian added.

It’s not just Keyrock making that case. In March, a report from crypto research firm Messari also argued that buybacks are a poor use of capital.

“Our analysis finds no clear evidence that the market rewards these initiatives, as token performance remains driven by metrics growth and narrative formation,” Sunny Shi, the report’s author, said.

Still, the perception that buybacks help shore up token prices is powerful.

Perpetual futures exchange Hyperliquid has made token buybacks an integral part of its strategy. Many investors equate Hyperliquid’s buyback programme with the strong performance of its HYPE token, which has soared 500% since its November 2024 launch.

Seeing this success, others, such as the top lending protocol Aave, are also implementing buyback programmes.

Uncertain value

While DeFi tokens soared in 2021 as excitement around the sector peaked, many have since underperformed as the hype died down and investors began to question their high valuations.

Even the tokens of successful DeFi protocols, like liquid staking protocol Lido and credit protocol Sky, are trading well below their 2021 highs, despite their revenues increasing significantly since then.

“Tokens do not guarantee dividends, confer legal rights, or offer the clarity of earnings metrics,” the Keyrock report said. “The link between protocol performance and tokenholder value is therefore indirect and often uncertain.”

Buybacks are an attempt to ground token valuation in something tangible, such as a percentage of the protocol’s total revenue.

Despite their issues, the data shows buybacks aren’t a bad idea altogether, according to the Keyrock report.

“Disciplined programmes, grounded in revenue stability, treasury strength, and valuation awareness, can reinforce alignment and credibility,” Hajian said.

Tim Craig is DL News’ Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@dlnews.com.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token

Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token

The post Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Largest Bank in Spain Launches Crypto Service: Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token Sign Up for Our Newsletter! For updates and exclusive offers enter your email. Leah is a British journalist with a BA in Journalism, Media, and Communications and nearly a decade of content writing experience. Over the last four years, her focus has primarily been on Web3 technologies, driven by her genuine enthusiasm for decentralization and the latest technological advancements. She has contributed to leading crypto and NFT publications – Cointelegraph, Coinbound, Crypto News, NFT Plazas, Bitcolumnist, Techreport, and NFT Lately – which has elevated her to a senior role in crypto journalism. Whether crafting breaking news or in-depth reviews, she strives to engage her readers with the latest insights and information. Her articles often span the hottest cryptos, exchanges, and evolving regulations. As part of her ploy to attract crypto newbies into Web3, she explains even the most complex topics in an easily understandable and engaging way. Further underscoring her dynamic journalism background, she has written for various sectors, including software testing (TEST Magazine), travel (Travel Off Path), and music (Mixmag). When she’s not deep into a crypto rabbit hole, she’s probably island-hopping (with the Galapagos and Hainan being her go-to’s). Or perhaps sketching chalk pencil drawings while listening to the Pixies, her all-time favorite band. This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Center or Cookie Policy. I Agree Source: https://bitcoinist.com/banco-santander-and-snorter-token-crypto-services/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:45
Token Terminal Taps LayerZero to Provide Institutional-Level On-Chain Data Transparency

Token Terminal Taps LayerZero to Provide Institutional-Level On-Chain Data Transparency

Token Terminal, a prominent platform for on-chain analytics and data, has partnered with LayerZero, a cross-chain interoperability network. The partnership aim
Share
Coinstats2026/02/12 17:30
Will the "red envelope rally" of Bitcoin during the Lunar New Year repeat itself this year?

Will the "red envelope rally" of Bitcoin during the Lunar New Year repeat itself this year?

Looking back at the past Spring Festival market trends, Bitcoin has almost always risen during the Spring Festival – from 2015 to 2024, it recorded positive returns
Share
PANews2026/02/12 17:12