The post Gnosis confirms hard fork to recover funds lost in Balancer hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gnosis Chain has confirmed that it has executed aThe post Gnosis confirms hard fork to recover funds lost in Balancer hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gnosis Chain has confirmed that it has executed a

Gnosis confirms hard fork to recover funds lost in Balancer hack

Gnosis Chain has confirmed that it has executed a hard fork to recover approximately $9.4 million in funds frozen following the November 2025 Balancer V2 exploit. The hard fork activated on December 22, 2025, and the announcement came the next day via the official Gnosis Chain account. 

According to the official announcement posted on Gnosis Chain’s X page, the hard fork has been activated, and the funds are no longer within the hacker’s control. To ensure consensus, the post also urged all remaining node operators to take action to avoid penalties.

The decision to rewrite the blockchain’s recent history to make users whole was touted as a solution, but it has exposed fault lines over governance and precedent on Gnosis Chain.

Gnosis Chain initiates a hard fork

According to a governance forum post, Philippe Schommers, Gnosis’ head of infrastructure, floated the idea that the network would need to undergo a hard fork on December 12. According to Schommers, this would help return funds frozen during the recent exploit of the DeFi protocol Balancer.

The hard fork was scheduled to go live on December 22.

Schommers wrote to nodes that fail to follow the chain with a majority of stake that they will face penalties. He said the team was focused on returning user funds by Christmas.

The move was framed as a technical “rescue mission,” but the announcement sparked a heated debate in the project’s community over who gets to decide when a blockchain’s immutability can be broken.

At the time, Schommers called the surrounding debate “an important one and, as always, we welcome all contributions.” He also emphasized that the hard fork depends on Gnosis Chain validators to go through.

“As it stands, our validators have a choice to exercise their collective power transparently, to protect users, even as we work toward a future where no one has that power at all,” he said.

Schommers also countered fears of the update affecting the chain’s immutability. “The hard fork requires relatively minor changes that do not affect chain history – and therefore do not affect fundamental immutability, which stands at the core of our ethos,” he said.

Why is Gnosis Chain going through a hard fork?

Balancer, an established decentralized exchange and automated market maker protocol, was targeted in November when an attacker exploited a vulnerability to siphon $128 million from Balancer V2 liquidity pools across multiple chains.

Harry Donnelly, founder and CEO of Circuit, has tagged Balancer’s breach “a serious warning” for the DeFi ecosystem. According to Donelly, the target was “one of the most trusted names in the space” and “an early pioneer with a culture of compliance, backed by rigorous audits and open disclosure.”

In response to the exploit, validators approved a soft fork that restricted bridge movements, freezing $9.4 million of the stolen assets on-chain. Recovering those funds required a hard fork, which is what triggered debates on the network’s commitment to immutability.

There have been mixed reactions to the move, with the camp split over how to interpret it.  Lefteris Karapetsas, the founder of Rotki, a privacy-focused portfolio tracker, claimed the move reflects accountability rather than centralization.

“The coordinated soft fork and the clear plan toward a hard fork show that Gnosis Chain takes security, users, and ecosystem responsibility seriously,” wrote Karapetsas.

Others have claimed it sets a dangerous future precedent and have demanded formal rules to govern future interventions.

A user under the alias TheVoidFreak noted in their forum response that accepting a hard fork requires “a strict framework that no one can deviate from,” arguing that without it, violations of “Code is law” and immutability would have unmanaged consequences.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days – normally $100/mo.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/gnosis-hard-fork-to-recover-funds/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

The post What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market cap reached $4.3 trillion in 2025 as institutions
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:23
Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

The post Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pudgy Penguins,
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:41