Wallets tied to Aleksey Bilyuchenko moved 1,300 Bitcoins worth about $114 million to unidentified platforms over the past week, according to Arkham analyst EmmettWallets tied to Aleksey Bilyuchenko moved 1,300 Bitcoins worth about $114 million to unidentified platforms over the past week, according to Arkham analyst Emmett

Addresses tied to Mt. Gox move 1,300 Bitcoins ($114M) to unidentified platforms

Wallets tied to Aleksey Bilyuchenko moved 1,300 Bitcoins worth about $114 million to unidentified platforms over the past week, according to Arkham analyst Emmett Gallic.

Aleksey is connected to the Mt. Gox breach and the operation of BTC-e, and these same wallets still control 4,100 Bitcoins valued near $360 million, while 2,300 Bitcoins have already been sold as of press time.

This latest development adds to a case that stretches back more than a decade, as Aleksey faces U.S. charges tied to the laundering of crypto connected to these historic exchange crimes.

Aleksey Bilyuchenko‑linked addresses deposit 1,300 Bitcoins ($114M) to unidentified platformsSource: Arkham/X

BTC-e handled billions while running outside U.S. rules

The US Secret Service records from June 7, 2023 said Aleksey worked with Alexander Vinnik and others to operate BTC-e from 2011 until its shutdown by US DOJ in July 2017.

During those 6 years, BTC-e was one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges, serving more than one million users worldwide.

Prosecutors say BTC-e received proceeds tied to computer intrusions, hacking incidents, ransomware events, identity theft schemes, corrupt public officials, and narcotics distribution rings. The exchange operated without a license and without required controls.

Aleksey is charged with money laundering conspiracy and operating an unlicensed money services business, according to court filings by the DOJ.

From September 2011 through at least May 2014, the group caused the theft of roughly 647,000 Bitcoins, which is most of the Bitcoins held for Mt. Gox customers.

Prosecutors say that the stolen Bitcoin was laundered mainly through addresses linked to accounts Aleksey and his group controlled at two other online exchanges identified in the filings as Exchange-1 and Exchange-2, along with a specific Mt. Gox user account.

In April 2012, Aleksey and Verner negotiated a fraudulent Advertising Contract with a Bitcoin brokerage based in the Southern District of New York. Under the contract, the brokerage made large wire transfers to offshore bank accounts, including accounts held by shell companies controlled by the group. Between March 2012 and April 2013, the broker sent more than $6.6 million overseas.

In return, the brokerage received credit on Exchange-1. Through that access, the group laundered more than 300,000 Bitcoins taken from Mt. Gox. The Advertising Contract served as a cover that allowed the stolen Bitcoin to be concealed and liquidated.

Former U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said, “As alleged, Alexey Bilyuchenko and Aleksandr Verner thought they could outsmart the law by using sophisticated hacks to steal and launder massive amounts of cryptocurrency, a novel technology at the time, but the charges unsealed demonstrate our ability to tenaciously pursue these alleged criminals, no matter how complex their schemes, until they are brought to justice.”

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

The post What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market cap reached $4.3 trillion in 2025 as institutions
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:23
Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

The post Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pudgy Penguins,
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:41