The post Pump.fun Slashes Creator Fees to Reward Traders appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pump.fun is restructuring its creator fees so that traders are treatedThe post Pump.fun Slashes Creator Fees to Reward Traders appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pump.fun is restructuring its creator fees so that traders are treated

Pump.fun Slashes Creator Fees to Reward Traders

Pump.fun is restructuring its creator fees so that traders are treated more favorably than token deployers. In 2026, the platform will undergo major changes to make memecoin trading more active.

Pump.fun is restructuring its fee base. The fees charged to creators of the platform did not provide sustainable outcomes. As the founder of Pump.fun on X, Alon claimed that the existing system posed serious issues.

Dynamic Fees V1 was introduced several months ago. The objective was straightforward: to start tokens, powerful incentives were needed by top founders. The number of success stories would increase throughout the ecosystem.

The Streaming Explosion That Couldn’t Last

Early findings were encouraging. The platform was flooded by creators in a week. There were a lot of people who had never used crypto apps. Backstreaming meta became prominent.

Doubled across the board. The volumes of bonding curves climbed in USD terms. The platform experienced some of the best on-chain conditions of 2025.

However, sustainability had eluded it. The model revealed the underlying weaknesses. Project tokens with active teams had creator fees. They did not work with average memecoin deployers.

Traders Are the Real Lifeblood

The motivational system changed riskily. The low-risk coin creation was preferred by users, as compared to the high-risk trading. The foundation of the platform is traders. They generate volume, liquidity, and risk.

Alon said on X that traders are the blood of the platform; successful tokens demand environments in which traders are interested in participating. Coins will not thrive without incentives for the traders.

Creator fees were also not useful. Numerous stories might use fees to their advantage. It was rational to pay a fee to prominent individuals associated with stories. Examples were White Whale and rainbowfish.

The experience of using the platform was deficient. There were problems of trust and broken promises by the users. The CTO coin requirement was a source of tension. It required superior tools to deploy fees.

Alon outlined three critical insights on X. Creator fees are effective in the case of high-quality project tokens. The mechanism should be more strategically deployed with a better UX. There are lots of tokens that do not require creator fees.

It was revealed by the unequal playing field. The creation of memecoins was excessively incentivised. Trading received too little. The balance had to be rectified.

You might also like: US Spot Crypto ETFs See Sharp Capital Rotation as Bitcoin and Ethereum Face Sustained Outflows

Market Forces Will Decide Fee Allocation

Major changes are imminent. Pump.fun will take a market approach. There will be an instance where traders decide the stories that warrant creator payment. They will also determine the use of fees.

I can say nothing just yet,” jotted X Alon. There are more communications on the way. The future of $PUMP has plentiful platform updates.

The founder was very optimistic. 2026 promises to be a year full of excitement to Pump.fun. The platform will provide the best conditions to have successful tokens.

The restructuring recognizes a mere fact. The success of memecoins is promoted by trading. Inventors are important; however, merchants are market makers. This reality will be reflected in the new model.

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/pump-fun-slashes-creator-fees-to-reward-traders/

Market Opportunity
pump.fun Logo
pump.fun Price(PUMP)
$0.002454
$0.002454$0.002454
+1.99%
USD
pump.fun (PUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
XRP Holds $1.88 Fibonacci Support as 3-Day Chart Signals Bullish Continuation

XRP Holds $1.88 Fibonacci Support as 3-Day Chart Signals Bullish Continuation

XRP is once again drawing attention on higher timeframes as its 3-day chart begins to mirror past bullish phases. Market observers are closely watching how the
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/11 21:30
Russians ask government hotlines whether pensions are paid in crypto

Russians ask government hotlines whether pensions are paid in crypto

                                                                               Crypto-related questions about pension payments are reaching Russia’s Social 
Share
Coinstats2026/01/11 20:13