Binance founder Changpeng Zhao has responded to recent allegations circulating about himself and the company. Here are the details. Continue Reading: ChangpengBinance founder Changpeng Zhao has responded to recent allegations circulating about himself and the company. Here are the details. Continue Reading: Changpeng

Changpeng Zhao (CZ) Responds to FUD Spreading About Binance and Himself

3 min read

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has issued a comprehensive statement regarding the “FUD” (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) content circulating on social media about the platform in recent days.

CZ responded individually to a number of issues, including the Polymarket allegations, the “supercycle” narrative, news of Bitcoin sales, and speculation surrounding the SAFU fund.

CZ stated that an event circulating on social media, allegedly reaching a $7 million volume on Polymarket related to Binance, was completely fake. Zhao argued that this event did not exist on Polymarket or any other prediction market, saying, “If there really was such a volume, I would have been the first to react.” The prediction market on Polymarket, asking “Will something be thrown in CZ’s face at a cryptocurrency event in 2026?”, was claimed to have reached a probability of over 80%.

CZ said the claim had excited some critics and worried some supporters, adding that the news was completely unfounded.

Zhao also responded humorously to claims that he had “canceled” the “supercycle” narrative, a frequent topic of discussion in the crypto market. Stating that he doesn’t have the power to control the markets, CZ reminded everyone of his previous statement where he only said he was “less confident than before.” He asserted that this statement was misinterpreted and that he has no authority to steer the market.

Related News: New Details About Cryptocurrencies Emerge in the Epstein Papers: A Founder Tried to Contact Epstein

One of the issues CZ addressed most clearly was the claim that “Binance sold $1 billion worth of Bitcoin.” Zhao stated that this news was a misinterpretation, saying that it was not Binance that sold Bitcoin, but rather the platform’s users.

CZ argued that the exchange’s wallet balances only change when users withdraw assets, stating that most users continue to hold their assets on Binance after trading and use the platform like a wallet. Therefore, he emphasized that trading volume should not be confused with company assets.

Another point of contention was Binance’s plan to convert its SAFU (Secure Asset Fund for Users) to Bitcoin. CZ reminded everyone that it had previously been announced that the fund would be converted to Bitcoin within 30 days. He stated that this conversion was planned to be spread over a specific period, not all at once, and that it was natural for the funds not to appear on-chain immediately. He also added that Binance is a centralized exchange (CEX) and conducts transactions through centralized liquidity, therefore purchases would not appear on decentralized exchanges (DEX).

CZ also used a mathematical analogy to illustrate that purchasing approximately $1 billion worth of Bitcoin within 30 days would have a limited impact on the market capitalization of $1.7 trillion. He stated that this move was more of a gesture of confidence, and that its psychological impact on the market depended on investors’ assessment.

*This is not investment advice.

Continue Reading: Changpeng Zhao (CZ) Responds to FUD Spreading About Binance and Himself

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19
Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/02/04 01:05