Elon Musk’s two most ambitious bets—rockets and artificial intelligence—are on a collision course. Reports this week suggest SpaceX and Musk’s AI startup xAI areElon Musk’s two most ambitious bets—rockets and artificial intelligence—are on a collision course. Reports this week suggest SpaceX and Musk’s AI startup xAI are

SpaceX to Merge with xAI?

2 min read

In late January 2026, Reuters reported that the two privately held companies are in talks to combine ahead of a planned SpaceX IPO later this year. The reported structure is a share swap: xAI shares exchanged for SpaceX shares, with some xAI executives potentially offered cash instead of SpaceX stock. Reuters also said two Nevada entities were created on January 21 that could help facilitate the transaction, and noted that Elon Musk, SpaceX, and xAI did not respond to requests for comment.

The strategic logic being floated is less “synergy” and more “Musk wants a single war chest for an expensive AI + space vision.” Reuters framed the deal as potentially accelerating SpaceX’s push toward space-based data centers, tying it directly to Musk’s stated belief that orbit will become the cheapest place to run AI. At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Musk said: “the lowest cost place to put AI will be in space. And that will be true within two years, maybe three at the latest.”

A day after the merger-talk report, Reuters separately noted Starlink updated its privacy policy to allow customer data to be used to train AI unless users opt out—fueling speculation that a combined company could feed more data into xAI’s models. One privacy-law professor, Georgetown University’s Anupam Chander, summed up the vibe: “It certainly raises my eyebrow and would make me concerned if I was a Starlink user.”

Polymarket odds give the marger 81% of happening, Source: X

As of February 2, 2026, other outlets said discussions were “advanced” and could be announced soon—but also warned they could still fall apart.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19
Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/02/04 01:05