The post ATOM Technical Analysis Feb 4 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ATOM, despite a short-term 1.84% recovery under the dominance of the general downtrendThe post ATOM Technical Analysis Feb 4 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ATOM, despite a short-term 1.84% recovery under the dominance of the general downtrend

ATOM Technical Analysis Feb 4

ATOM, despite a short-term 1.84% recovery under the dominance of the general downtrend, maintains its weak position below EMA20 ($2.18); with RSI at 39.81 in the neutral-bearish region, MACD showing a negative histogram, critical supports should be monitored in the $1.81-$1.96 range.

Executive Summary

ATOM’s technical chart signals a short-term recovery within the dominant downtrend, but the overall structure is bearish. Price at $2.05 testing minor resistance at $2.0552, Supertrend bearish and BTC’s downtrend creating additional pressure on altcoins. RSI balancing at neutral level while MACD confirms bearish momentum; a break above $2.14 in the short term could open bullish potential, but a break of $1.81 support could trigger a deep decline. Investors should position considering risk/reward balance, BTC movements below $75K are critical.

Market Structure and Trend Status

Current Trend Analysis

ATOM exhibits clear downtrend dominance in higher timeframes (1D, 3D, 1W). Although price traded in the $1.89-$2.11 range with a 1.84% increase in the last 24 hours, the overall trend direction is downward. The Supertrend indicator gives a bearish signal and positions $2.48 as resistance. The short-term recovery can be evaluated as a bounce within the downtrend channel, but no trend change is expected without a sustained close above EMA20 ($2.18). Multi-timeframe analysis detects a total of 10 strong levels: 2 supports/2 resistances on 1D, 1S/1R on 3D, and 2S/2R on 1W; these levels carry structural importance.

Structural Levels

Structural levels are determined based on Fibonacci retracements, previous swing lows/highs, and volume profile. The main support zone is $1.8100 (72/100 score), reinforced by strong volume accumulation; the level below is $1.9678 (71/100). Resistances include $2.0552 (64/100) as a minor test point just above current price, and $2.1446 (74/100) as a strong confluence. Higher up, there is $2.48 Supertrend resistance and $3.05 potential target. These levels highlight the fragility of market structure; a break below $1.81 triggers a bearish structure shift, while above $2.14 could create a bullish impulse.

Technical Indicators Report

Momentum Indicators

RSI(14) at 39.81, balancing in the neutral-bearish zone approaching the oversold region (below 30) without divergence; momentum is weak. MACD shows expanding negative histogram, bearish crossover confirmed below signal line – indicating short-term selling pressure. Stochastic %K 28.5, %D 32.1 gives oversold signal, but fakeout risk is high within the downtrend. Momentum confluence is bearish: Indicators do not support recovery, sustaining selling dominance.

Trend Indicators

Price trading below EMA20 ($2.18), EMA50 ($2.35), and EMA200 ($2.65); death cross (EMA20

Critical Support and Resistance Analysis

Support zones: $1.8100 (72/100) – strengthened by 1W swing low and volume cluster, break opens $1.23 bearish target. $1.9678 (71/100) intermediate support, 1D Fibonacci 0.618. Resistances: $2.0552 (64/100) current test point, daily pivot; no break. $2.1446 (74/100) strong R1, 3D high; $2.48 Supertrend. Multi-TF 10 levels (1D:2S/2R, 3D:1S/1R, 1W:2S/2R) high confluence, $2.14 with 74% score is critical turning point. Price squeezed at $2.05, volatility breakout expected.

Volume and Market Participation

24h volume $66.89M, moderate compared to 7-day average (45% increase); recovery volume low within downtrend, lacking conviction. OBV descending, no accumulation; CMF negative, smart money outflow. Volume profile POC at $1.89 (point of control), strong support volume. Resistance break without rising volume remains weak; bearish volume spike could accelerate $1.81 test. Market participation low, high probability of retail-driven bounce – institutional entry awaited.

Risk Assessment

Bullish target $3.0542 (45 score), 49% upside from current $2.05 (RR 1:2.1 assuming long entry $1.96 stop $1.81); however, probability 35% due to low score and BTC pressure. Bearish target $1.2271 (22 score), 40% downside, short RR 1:1.8. Main risks: BTC break below $75K (altcoin dump), volume deficiency, macro Fed decisions. Volatility ATR 0.12, max drawdown risk 15%. Position size 1-2% capital, trailing stop recommended; overall risk high bearish bias, longs counter-trend.

Bitcoin Correlation

ATOM correlates +0.85 with BTC; with BTC at $75,882 (-3.07%) in downtrend and Supertrend bearish, altcoins under pressure. BTC supports $75,472 / $72,930 / $61,211 – breaks send ATOM below $1.81. Resistances $77,795 / $81,773; BTC above $78K triggers ATOM rally to $2.14. BTC dominance rising, alt season distant; ATOM trades should be hedged with BTC key levels.

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

ATOM’s technical chart exhibits bearish confluence: Downtrend, price below EMA, bearish MACD/RSI, low volume, and BTC negativity. Short-term $2.0552-$2.14 range to be tested, breakout direction-determining. Strategy: Short bias on $2.14 rejection targeting $1.81, long only on $2.14+ confirmation. Detailed data available in ATOM Spot Analysis and ATOM Futures Analysis. Wait-and-see approach recommended, risk management priority. (Word count: 1247)

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/atom-comprehensive-technical-analysis-detailed-review-of-february-4-2026

Market Opportunity
Ucan fix life in1day Logo
Ucan fix life in1day Price(1)
$0.0007278
$0.0007278$0.0007278
+19.84%
USD
Ucan fix life in1day (1) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities

Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities

The post Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TD Securities expects China’s January CPI to slow, with its forecast
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/11 05:47
XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are…

XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are…

The post XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are… appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Like the broader crypto market, XRP’s relief
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/11 06:01