A senior Taiwanese official has rejected American demands to move a big chunk of the island's semiconductor manufacturing to the United States.A senior Taiwanese official has rejected American demands to move a big chunk of the island's semiconductor manufacturing to the United States.

Taiwan pushes back on US call to move 40% of chip output

2026/02/09 17:59
4 min read

A senior Taiwanese official has rejected American demands to move a big chunk of the island’s semiconductor manufacturing to the United States, calling the plan unrealistic.

Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun made an appearance on the local television network CTS on Sunday night, February 8, 2026. She stated that she informed U.S. officials that their goal of shifting 40% of production was unrealistic. According to Cheng, Taiwan’s decades-old chip-making infrastructure cannot be easily relocated to another place.

Official calls relocation target unworkable

“I have made it very clear to the United States that this is impossible,” Cheng said when asked about the 40 percent figure. Taiwan can establish new factories in other countries, America included. But she made clear that domestic production will continue to keep expanding at the same time. “Our overall capacity in Taiwan will only continue to grow,” the vice premier said.

Her position conflicts sharply with what US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has been saying. Lutnick’s pointed out that most advanced chip-making occurs less than 80 miles from China. He calls that “illogical.” The US government wants 40 percent of sophisticated semiconductor production on American soil by 2029.

There’s a conflict between industrial reality and political objectives. Cheng described the operation of the chip industry using a “iceberg” analogy. The factories that are visible to all are only the beginning. A vast local network of suppliers and employees lies beneath that. Relocating production entails moving hundreds of specialized businesses that are currently nonexistent in the United States.

Taiwan views its chip concentration as a “silicon shield.” It maintains the island is crucial to global security. Washington views it as a vulnerability. Cheng’s position is that Taiwan will support American development, but it will not sacrifice the home base that underpins its defense strategy.

Tariff threats and economic pressure mount

Lutnick’s warned of harsh financial consequences if things don’t change. On CNBC, he said Taiwan’s 15 percent import duty now could spike all the way to 100 percent. A January 15, 2026 deal had lowered those rates from 20 percent. But that relief is now tied to hitting production targets.

That January agreement had Taiwanese firms pledging $250 billion in US investments. There’s another $250 billion in government credit guarantees backing it up. Still, those numbers might not get to the 40 percent benchmark. The pressure did work to some extent, TSMC committed $165 billion to an Arizona project. But retaliatory tariffs would increase costs for US military hardware and AI systems.

Economic experts in Taiwan are skeptical about such a big transformation happening. Lien Hsien-ming, who runs the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, said recently that the talk about bringing production back might be overblown. His analysis suggests less than 15 percent of TSMC’s advanced manufacturing will be in the United States by the end of this administration.

According to TSMC’s leadership, US activities are undoubtedly expanding. For logistical considerations, the most sophisticated manufacturing remains in Taiwan. By 2029, the Arizona “Megafab” plans to produce 2nm and 1.6nm (A16) chips. Only once those state-of-the-art procedures are stable domestically will they move abroad.

Taiwan is ready to help the US build similar industrial hubs while keeping its technology parks domestic. Cheng remains confident that Taiwan’s internal capacity, current facilities plus future ones, will consistently outpace international investments.

The recent trade agreement cut standard tariffs to 15 percent, providing relief. TSMC’s moving ahead with its $165 billion Arizona expansion and just added 900 acres in Phoenix. But Taipei’s position remains unchanged. US facilities supplement Taiwan’s central manufacturing role, they don’t replace it.

The 2029 deadline is getting closer. The standoff between Washington’s “onshoring” push and Taipei’s “rooted” strategy means the chip industry remains a critical flashpoint in trade.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
Movement Logo
Movement Price(MOVE)
$0.02174
$0.02174$0.02174
-5.51%
USD
Movement (MOVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15
White House meeting could unfreeze the crypto CLARITY Act this week, but crypto rewards likely to be the price

White House meeting could unfreeze the crypto CLARITY Act this week, but crypto rewards likely to be the price

White House stablecoin meeting could unfreeze the CLARITY Act, but your USDC rewards may be the price The newly confirmed Feb. 10 White House meeting on stablecoin
Share
CryptoSlate2026/02/09 18:48
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28