The post XPL Technical Analysis Feb 19 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XPL’s technical chart reflects the dominant bearish trend; while the price is positionedThe post XPL Technical Analysis Feb 19 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XPL’s technical chart reflects the dominant bearish trend; while the price is positioned

XPL Technical Analysis Feb 19

XPL’s technical chart reflects the dominant bearish trend; while the price is positioned below EMA20, Supertrend gives a bearish signal at resistance. Although RSI is in the neutral zone, a slight bullish divergence is observed in momentum with MACD’s positive histogram, overall a cautious approach is necessary.

Executive Summary

XPL is trading at $0.09 as of February 19, 2026, sustaining bearish pressure with a 2.41% decline in the last 24 hours. The price being below EMA20 ($0.10) and Supertrend bearish keeps the short-term trend negative; however, positive histogram in MACD and neutral momentum at RSI 42 may indicate potential base formation. Critical supports cluster at $0.0824 and $0.0700, while resistances will be tested in the $0.0936-$0.1003 range. Bitcoin’s bearish trend carries additional risk for altcoins; due to low reward/risk ratio bull targets, follow XPL Spot Analysis and XPL Futures Analysis for cautious long/short strategies.

Market Structure and Trend Status

Current Trend Analysis

XPL shows clear downtrend dominance in higher timeframes (1D, 3D, 1W). The price maintained its downward momentum after rejection from $0.12 Supertrend resistance in recent weeks. Although there are local corrections in short-term 1H/4H charts, the overall structure does not support higher high/lower low breakouts. Multi-timeframe analysis identified 10 strong levels: 3 supports/2 resistances on 1D, 2S/1R on 3D, 2S/3R distribution on 1W, giving weight to the long-term bearish scenario. Price remaining below EMA20 ($0.10) reinforces short-term bearish bias and points to a local base test around $0.09.

Structural Levels

Structurally, XPL is moving within the main descending channel; channel upper band at $0.12, lower band at $0.07. Breakout points: Upward at $0.10 EMA cluster, downward at $0.0824 strong support. Fibonacci retracement 61.8% level aligns with $0.0924, standing out as near-term support. Long-term trendline (1W) holds $0.13 as resistance, making breakout mandatory for trend change.

Technical Indicators Report

Momentum Indicators

RSI(14) at 42.36 is balanced in the neutral zone; not approaching oversold (30) but reflecting bearish momentum below 50. Despite a slight recovery signal in the last 24 hours, no divergence. MACD shows notable positive histogram expansion: Bull momentum increases after crossover above signal line, but being below zero line delays trend change. Stochastic %K/%D in 35/40 range, showing local buying pressure but not disrupting overall bear dominance. CCI at -85 in negative zone, confirming short-term weakness.

Trend Indicators

Supertrend in bearish mode, $0.12 resistance line active. EMAs hierarchy disrupted: Price below EMA20 ($0.10), EMA50 ($0.105), and EMA200 ($0.11); death cross (EMA20/50) completed. SMA100 forms resistance at $0.095. In Ichimoku Cloud, price below cloud, Tenkan/Kijun death cross bearish. Parabolic SAR dots above signaling sell. Overall trend indicators show 80% bearish confluence.

Critical Support and Resistance Analysis

Support zones: $0.0824 (71/100 score, 1D/3D confluence, volume base), $0.0700 (68/100, 1W low, Fib 78.6%), $0.0924 (62/100, local pivot). Break below $0.0824 opens bearish targets to $0.05. Resistances: $0.0936 (77/100, EMA20/SMA50 intersection), $0.1003 (64/100, psychological/Supertrend), $0.12 (high-volume former high). Near-term key is $0.0936 test; breakout above $0.10 brings bull confirmation. Level scores multi-TF verified, 70%+ scores high probability.

Volume and Market Participation

Last 24h volume at $42.79M is moderate; decreasing volume during downtrend implies weakening selling pressure. OBV in downtrend but showing divergence (OBV stable while price falls), potential hidden accumulation. VWAP at $0.095 below price, institutional selling impression. Delta volume negative but signaling turn to positive in recent hours. Overall participation low, volume increase necessary for breakout (>$60M target).

Risk Assessment

From current $0.09, bull target $0.1489 (65% up, 30/100 score, low probability), bear target $0.0138 (85% down, 22/100 score). Risk/reward ratio bull 1:0.8 (weak), bear 1:1.5 (attractive). Main risks: BTC decline crushes altcoins, low-volume rally trap, macro FUD. Volatility 5.2% (high), stop-loss suggestion: Long $0.088, short $0.095. Position size limited to 1-2% risk; overall outlook neutral-bearish, long only after $0.0936 breakout.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at $66,705 (-0.89%) in downtrend, Supertrend bearish. XPL 0.85% correlated with BTC; if BTC supports $65,143/$62,910 break, XPL loses $0.0824. If BTC resistances $67,135/$70,639 surpassed, altcoin rally triggered, leading XPL to $0.10 test. With BTC.D high, alts under pressure; BTC stabilization gives XPL breathing room, but dominance increase strengthens bear scenario. Key to watch: BTC below $65k cascade risk.

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

XPL technical chart maintains dominant bearish structure: Trend indicators bearish, momentum mixed, levels downward-focused. Short-term $0.0936 resistance key; absence of breakout brings pullback to $0.0824 support. Long-term recovery requires $0.12 Supertrend breakout and BTC support. Strategy: Short bias (60% probability), $0.0936 rejection to $0.0824 target; long only with confluence. Follow XPL Spot Analysis and XPL Futures Analysis for detailed updates. Cautious capital allocation and tight risk management essential; market volatile, monitor news flow.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Senior Technical Analyst: James Mitchell

6 years of crypto market analysis

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/xpl-comprehensive-technical-analysis-detailed-review-of-february-19-2026

Market Opportunity
Plasma Logo
Plasma Price(XPL)
$0.09079
$0.09079$0.09079
-6.60%
USD
Plasma (XPL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Fintech Is Leveling the Playing Field in Trading, Says Zak Westphal

Fintech Is Leveling the Playing Field in Trading, Says Zak Westphal

The post Fintech Is Leveling the Playing Field in Trading, Says Zak Westphal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The trading world was once divided into two groups: those with access to high-powered data and those without.  As you might have guessed, it was the major institutions (like Wall Street) that had a monopoly on the tools, data access, and speed. This left retail traders fighting to keep up. This gap is closing rapidly, and the main reason is the introduction of new technology and platforms entering the fold. Zak Westphal has been at the forefront of this transformation. While Co-Founding StocksToTrade, he has been a big part of empowering everyday traders to gain access to the real-time information and algorithmic systems that have long provided Wall Street with its edge. We spoke with him about how fintech is reshaping the landscape and what it really means for retail traders today. Fintech has changed everything from banking to payments. In your opinion, what has been its greatest impact on the world of trading? For me, it’s all about access. When I began my trading career, institutions had a significant advantage, even more pronounced than it is now. They had direct feeds of data, algorithmic systems, and research teams monitoring information right around the clock. Retail traders, on the other hand, had slower information and pretty basic tools in comparison.  Fintech has substantially changed the game. Today, a retail trader from home can access real-time market data, scan thousands of stocks in mere seconds, and utilize algorithmic tools that were once only available to hedge funds. I can’t think of a time when the access for everyday traders has been as accessible as it is today. That doesn’t mean the advantages are gone, because Wall Street still has resources that individuals simply can’t have. However, there is now an opportunity for everyday traders actually to compete. And that is a…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 17:14
SAP Proposes Dividend of €2.50 per Share

SAP Proposes Dividend of €2.50 per Share

WALLDORF, Germany, Feb. 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — The Supervisory Board and Executive Board of SAP SE (NYSE: SAP) recommend that shareholders approve a dividend of
Share
AI Journal2026/02/19 15:30