The post $27M Gone in Seconds: Venus Protocol User Hit by Phishing Attack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Rumors spread fast in crypto. Yesterday, whispers of an exploit on Venus Protocol sent shockwaves across X. At first, some thought the lending protocol itself had been breached. But hours of joint analysis cleared the air, Venus wasn’t hacked. Instead, a phishing attack snared a whale, draining $27 million in assets with one bad transaction. This wasn’t a protocol failure. It was human error. And it’s a stark reminder of DeFi’s biggest weakness: one careless click can wipe out a fortune. The victim approved a malicious transaction from a fake site. That single signature gave the attacker’s burner wallet, 0x7fd8…202a, unlimited access to his tokens. Once approval was granted, the attacker struck instantly. Assets vanished in seconds. According to Cyvers Alerts 🚨ALERT🚨27M suspicious transaction has been detected involving a user of @VenusProtocol on the #BNBChain The user unknowingly approved a malicious transaction, granting token permissions that resulted in the loss of $27M in digital assets. The stolen funds are currently held… pic.twitter.com/WekHEicyec — 🚨 Cyvers Alerts 🚨 (@CyversAlerts) September 2, 2025 And, here’s what got drained: $19.8M vUSDT $7.15M vUSDC $146K vXRP $22K vETH Even 285 BTCB on BNB Chain Generational wealth gone. Just like that. The Wild Part: Venus Was Never Hacked Venus Protocol confirmed on X Update: we are in direct contact with the victim of the phishing attack, and the protocol will remain paused while we try to recover his funds. Venus was not exploited, but we are committed to protecting our users. If the protocol resumes now, the hacker gets the user’s funds. https://t.co/441ncPEbla — Venus Protocol (@VenusProtocol) September 2, 2025 that their contracts were safe. The frontend? Fine. No smart contract vulnerabilities. No code exploits. This was pure social engineering. A fake link, a trusted click, and boom, open approvals did the rest. That’s the… The post $27M Gone in Seconds: Venus Protocol User Hit by Phishing Attack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Rumors spread fast in crypto. Yesterday, whispers of an exploit on Venus Protocol sent shockwaves across X. At first, some thought the lending protocol itself had been breached. But hours of joint analysis cleared the air, Venus wasn’t hacked. Instead, a phishing attack snared a whale, draining $27 million in assets with one bad transaction. This wasn’t a protocol failure. It was human error. And it’s a stark reminder of DeFi’s biggest weakness: one careless click can wipe out a fortune. The victim approved a malicious transaction from a fake site. That single signature gave the attacker’s burner wallet, 0x7fd8…202a, unlimited access to his tokens. Once approval was granted, the attacker struck instantly. Assets vanished in seconds. According to Cyvers Alerts 🚨ALERT🚨27M suspicious transaction has been detected involving a user of @VenusProtocol on the #BNBChain The user unknowingly approved a malicious transaction, granting token permissions that resulted in the loss of $27M in digital assets. The stolen funds are currently held… pic.twitter.com/WekHEicyec — 🚨 Cyvers Alerts 🚨 (@CyversAlerts) September 2, 2025 And, here’s what got drained: $19.8M vUSDT $7.15M vUSDC $146K vXRP $22K vETH Even 285 BTCB on BNB Chain Generational wealth gone. Just like that. The Wild Part: Venus Was Never Hacked Venus Protocol confirmed on X Update: we are in direct contact with the victim of the phishing attack, and the protocol will remain paused while we try to recover his funds. Venus was not exploited, but we are committed to protecting our users. If the protocol resumes now, the hacker gets the user’s funds. https://t.co/441ncPEbla — Venus Protocol (@VenusProtocol) September 2, 2025 that their contracts were safe. The frontend? Fine. No smart contract vulnerabilities. No code exploits. This was pure social engineering. A fake link, a trusted click, and boom, open approvals did the rest. That’s the…

$27M Gone in Seconds: Venus Protocol User Hit by Phishing Attack

4 min read

Rumors spread fast in crypto. Yesterday, whispers of an exploit on Venus Protocol sent shockwaves across X. At first, some thought the lending protocol itself had been breached.

But hours of joint analysis cleared the air, Venus wasn’t hacked. Instead, a phishing attack snared a whale, draining $27 million in assets with one bad transaction.

This wasn’t a protocol failure. It was human error. And it’s a stark reminder of DeFi’s biggest weakness: one careless click can wipe out a fortune.

The victim approved a malicious transaction from a fake site. That single signature gave the attacker’s burner wallet, 0x7fd8…202a, unlimited access to his tokens.

Once approval was granted, the attacker struck instantly. Assets vanished in seconds. According to Cyvers Alerts

And, here’s what got drained:

$19.8M vUSDT

$7.15M vUSDC

$146K vXRP

$22K vETH

Even 285 BTCB on BNB Chain

Generational wealth gone. Just like that.

The Wild Part: Venus Was Never Hacked

Venus Protocol confirmed on X

that their contracts were safe. The frontend? Fine. No smart contract vulnerabilities. No code exploits.

This was pure social engineering. A fake link, a trusted click, and boom, open approvals did the rest.

That’s the dark side of DeFi power. Unlimited token approvals make DeFi seamless and fast. But they also turn every wallet into a ticking time bomb if approvals fall into the wrong hands.

Community Reaction: Shock and Sympathy

Crypto Twitter lit up with reactions. Some expressed sympathy for the whale; others saw it as another warning.

He noted how attackers patiently wait for one careless moment. The phishing link likely circulated for days before the victim clicked.

Venus Protocol has since paused parts of the platform while working directly with the victim. Recovery options remain slim, but efforts are ongoing.

Why Phishing Keeps Winning in DeFi

DeFi removes middlemen. That’s the beauty, and the danger. You hold the keys. You sign the transactions. There’s no customer support if things go wrong.

Phishers exploit this perfectly:

  • Fake sites copy real ones pixel-for-pixel.
  • Twitter bots reply under official announcements with “urgent” links.
  • Unlimited approvals mean attackers only need access once.

In TradFi, banks can reverse fraudulent transfers. In DeFi, blockchain immutability means once assets leave your wallet, they’re gone.

Lessons Learned: How to Stay Safe

The Venus incident highlights simple but critical safety steps:

1. Don’t trust random links. Always type URLs manually or bookmark official sites.

2. Double-check every transaction. Read approvals before signing, infinite token access is risky.

3. Revoke old approvals regularly. Tools like Revoke.cash make it easy.

4. Use hardware wallets. They add a physical confirmation step attackers can’t bypass.

Phishers thrive in bull markets when wallets grow fat. They know greed kills caution. Don’t give them an opening.

The Bigger Picture: Social Engineering vs. Smart Contracts

This attack shows where DeFi risks really lie.

Smart contracts are getting stronger. Protocol exploits, while still happening, are down compared to 2021-22.

Humans, on the other hand, remain the weakest link.

Phishers don’t need to hack code when they can hack trust. A fake MetaMask popup. A Twitter link promising “airdrops.” One moment of distraction can cost millions.

Security experts argue education matters more than new tech here. Wallet UX improvements, clearer approval warnings, and better scam detection could help. But ultimately, self-custody comes with self-responsibility.

Will Funds Be Recovered?

Venus Protocol confirmed communication with the victim. Recovery efforts are on, but realistically, funds drained to attacker-controlled wallets rarely come back.

Sometimes, attackers negotiate for ransom-like returns, but there’s no sign of that yet. The assets may get mixed through bridges and mixers soon, making tracing harder.

Final Thoughts: A Wake-Up Call for DeFi Users

This wasn’t just another exploit headline. It’s a reminder that DeFi security starts with the user.

Protocols can be bulletproof. Audits can pass. But one bad click can still drain millions.

As the bull market heats up, expect more phishing attempts. More fake airdrops. More Twitter bots with urgent links.

  • Don’t be the next headline.
  • Double-check. Revoke often. Stay paranoid.
  • Because in DeFi, you only learn this lesson once.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Source: https://nulltx.com/27m-gone-in-seconds-venus-protocol-user-hit-by-phishing-attack/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.00661
$0.00661$0.00661
-5.63%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

‘KISS’ Rock Star Gene Simmons Believes You Must Hold Bitcoin

‘KISS’ Rock Star Gene Simmons Believes You Must Hold Bitcoin

The post ‘KISS’ Rock Star Gene Simmons Believes You Must Hold Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Simmons recommends holding Bitcoin Bitcoin drawdown unfair
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/06 02:10
Trump donor's private jet is now being used for deportations

Trump donor's private jet is now being used for deportations

A new investigation from The Guardian published Thursday has revealed that a friend and donor of President Donald Trump has been using his private jet for deportations
Share
Rawstory2026/02/06 02:34
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26