Original title: "Established DeFi Platform Falls: Balancer V2 Contract Vulnerability Leads to the Theft of Over $110 Million in Assets" Original author: Wenser, Odaily Planet Daily On November 3rd, it was reported that Balancer, a long-established DeFi protocol, had suffered a theft of over $70 million in assets. This news was subsequently confirmed by multiple sources, and the amount of stolen funds continued to rise. As of this writing, the amount of stolen assets from Balancer has increased to over $116 million. Odaily will provide a brief analysis of this matter in this article. Details of the Balancer theft: Losses exceeded $116 million, primarily due to a vulnerability in the v2 pool smart contract. According to on-chain information, the Balancer attackers have stolen over $116 million, primarily in the form of WETH, wstETH, osETH, frxETH, rsETH, and rETH, distributed across multiple chains including ETH, Base, and Sonic. • Assets stolen from the Ethereum blockchain: approximately $100 million; • Nearly $8 million in assets stolen from the Arbitrum blockchain; • Stolen assets on the Base blockchain: nearly $3.95 million; • Stolen assets on the Sonic blockchain: Over $3.4 million; • Optimism on-chain stolen assets: nearly $1.57 million; • Stolen assets on the Polygon blockchain: approximately $230,000. Crypto KOL Adi reported that preliminary investigations indicate the attack primarily targeted Balancer's V2 vaults and liquidity pools, exploiting vulnerabilities in smart contract interactions. On-chain investigators pointed out that a maliciously deployed contract manipulated Vault calls during liquidity pool initialization. Incorrect authorization and callback handling allowed the attacker to bypass safeguards, enabling unauthorized swaps or balance manipulation between interconnected liquidity pools, resulting in the rapid theft of assets within minutes. Based on the available information, there is no private key leak; this is purely a smart contract vulnerability. Kebabsec auditor and Citrea developer @okkothejawa also posted, stating that "(the check error mentioned by @moo9000) may not be the root cause, because ops.sender == msg.sender in all 'manageUserBalance' calls. The security vulnerability may have occurred in a transaction before the contract for withdrawing assets was created, as it caused some state changes in the Balancer vault." Balancer has responded, stating, "The official team is aware of the potential vulnerability affecting Balancer v2 pools. Our engineering and security teams are investigating this as a high priority. We will share verified updates and follow-up steps as soon as we obtain more information." Berachain, which faces potential asset damage risks, responded immediately. Following the Berachain Foundation's statement, Berachain founder Smokey The Bera stated that "the Bera node group has proactively suspended the operation of the public chain to prevent the Balancer vulnerability from affecting BEX (mainly the USDe three pools)." • Have the Ethena team disable Bera bridging. • USDe deposits are disabled/suspended in the lending market. • Suspension of HONEY token minting and exchange • Communicate with CEX and other entities to ensure that the hacker's address is blacklisted. Our goal is to recover funds as quickly as possible and ensure the safety of all LPs. The Berachain team will release the binary to relevant node validators and service providers as soon as it is ready (this involves some slot refactoring, etc., and not just modifying the Bera token balance, as the pool contains non-native assets). For detailed on-chain information regarding the Balancer attacker, please see: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/cd756cb8-6a84-4f40-9361-f6c548544430 The Balancer hack has alarmed crypto whales the most. As a long-established DeFi protocol, Balancer users are undoubtedly the most directly affected by this theft. For users now, the following actions can be taken: • Withdraw funds from the Balancer v2 pool to prevent further losses; • Revoke authorization: Use Revoke, DeBank, or Etherscan to revoke smart contract permissions for a Balancer address to avoid potential security risks; • Stay alert: Closely monitor the Balancer attackers' next move and whether it will have a cascading impact on other DeFi protocols. In addition, a crypto whale that had been dormant for three years was among the victims that attracted market attention during this theft. According to LookonChain monitoring, a crypto whale, 0x0090, which had been dormant for three years, has just awakened after the Balancer platform vulnerability occurred, and is eager to withdraw its $6.5 million worth of assets from Balancer. On-chain information can be found at: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x009023dA14A3C9f448B75f33cEb9291c21373bD8 Follow-up developments: Hackers begin token exchange scheme According to on-chain analyst Ember, the hackers involved in the Balancer theft have begun attempting to exchange numerous Liquidity Staking Tokens (LST) for ETH. Previously, they exchanged 10 osETH for 10.55 ETH. On-chain information shows that hackers are using Cow Protocol to continuously exchange stolen assets across multiple blockchains for assets such as ETH and USDC. Currently, the chances of recovering these stolen assets appear slim. Odaily will continue to follow up on whether Balancer can find the vulnerability in the protocol contract in time and recover the stolen assets or provide a corresponding solution.Original title: "Established DeFi Platform Falls: Balancer V2 Contract Vulnerability Leads to the Theft of Over $110 Million in Assets" Original author: Wenser, Odaily Planet Daily On November 3rd, it was reported that Balancer, a long-established DeFi protocol, had suffered a theft of over $70 million in assets. This news was subsequently confirmed by multiple sources, and the amount of stolen funds continued to rise. As of this writing, the amount of stolen assets from Balancer has increased to over $116 million. Odaily will provide a brief analysis of this matter in this article. Details of the Balancer theft: Losses exceeded $116 million, primarily due to a vulnerability in the v2 pool smart contract. According to on-chain information, the Balancer attackers have stolen over $116 million, primarily in the form of WETH, wstETH, osETH, frxETH, rsETH, and rETH, distributed across multiple chains including ETH, Base, and Sonic. • Assets stolen from the Ethereum blockchain: approximately $100 million; • Nearly $8 million in assets stolen from the Arbitrum blockchain; • Stolen assets on the Base blockchain: nearly $3.95 million; • Stolen assets on the Sonic blockchain: Over $3.4 million; • Optimism on-chain stolen assets: nearly $1.57 million; • Stolen assets on the Polygon blockchain: approximately $230,000. Crypto KOL Adi reported that preliminary investigations indicate the attack primarily targeted Balancer's V2 vaults and liquidity pools, exploiting vulnerabilities in smart contract interactions. On-chain investigators pointed out that a maliciously deployed contract manipulated Vault calls during liquidity pool initialization. Incorrect authorization and callback handling allowed the attacker to bypass safeguards, enabling unauthorized swaps or balance manipulation between interconnected liquidity pools, resulting in the rapid theft of assets within minutes. Based on the available information, there is no private key leak; this is purely a smart contract vulnerability. Kebabsec auditor and Citrea developer @okkothejawa also posted, stating that "(the check error mentioned by @moo9000) may not be the root cause, because ops.sender == msg.sender in all 'manageUserBalance' calls. The security vulnerability may have occurred in a transaction before the contract for withdrawing assets was created, as it caused some state changes in the Balancer vault." Balancer has responded, stating, "The official team is aware of the potential vulnerability affecting Balancer v2 pools. Our engineering and security teams are investigating this as a high priority. We will share verified updates and follow-up steps as soon as we obtain more information." Berachain, which faces potential asset damage risks, responded immediately. Following the Berachain Foundation's statement, Berachain founder Smokey The Bera stated that "the Bera node group has proactively suspended the operation of the public chain to prevent the Balancer vulnerability from affecting BEX (mainly the USDe three pools)." • Have the Ethena team disable Bera bridging. • USDe deposits are disabled/suspended in the lending market. • Suspension of HONEY token minting and exchange • Communicate with CEX and other entities to ensure that the hacker's address is blacklisted. Our goal is to recover funds as quickly as possible and ensure the safety of all LPs. The Berachain team will release the binary to relevant node validators and service providers as soon as it is ready (this involves some slot refactoring, etc., and not just modifying the Bera token balance, as the pool contains non-native assets). For detailed on-chain information regarding the Balancer attacker, please see: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/cd756cb8-6a84-4f40-9361-f6c548544430 The Balancer hack has alarmed crypto whales the most. As a long-established DeFi protocol, Balancer users are undoubtedly the most directly affected by this theft. For users now, the following actions can be taken: • Withdraw funds from the Balancer v2 pool to prevent further losses; • Revoke authorization: Use Revoke, DeBank, or Etherscan to revoke smart contract permissions for a Balancer address to avoid potential security risks; • Stay alert: Closely monitor the Balancer attackers' next move and whether it will have a cascading impact on other DeFi protocols. In addition, a crypto whale that had been dormant for three years was among the victims that attracted market attention during this theft. According to LookonChain monitoring, a crypto whale, 0x0090, which had been dormant for three years, has just awakened after the Balancer platform vulnerability occurred, and is eager to withdraw its $6.5 million worth of assets from Balancer. On-chain information can be found at: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x009023dA14A3C9f448B75f33cEb9291c21373bD8 Follow-up developments: Hackers begin token exchange scheme According to on-chain analyst Ember, the hackers involved in the Balancer theft have begun attempting to exchange numerous Liquidity Staking Tokens (LST) for ETH. Previously, they exchanged 10 osETH for 10.55 ETH. On-chain information shows that hackers are using Cow Protocol to continuously exchange stolen assets across multiple blockchains for assets such as ETH and USDC. Currently, the chances of recovering these stolen assets appear slim. Odaily will continue to follow up on whether Balancer can find the vulnerability in the protocol contract in time and recover the stolen assets or provide a corresponding solution.

A complete analysis of the Balancer V2 contract vulnerability incident: the whole story of the theft of over $116 million in assets.

2025/11/04 10:00

Original title: "Established DeFi Platform Falls: Balancer V2 Contract Vulnerability Leads to the Theft of Over $110 Million in Assets"

Original author: Wenser, Odaily Planet Daily

On November 3rd, it was reported that Balancer, a long-established DeFi protocol, had suffered a theft of over $70 million in assets. This news was subsequently confirmed by multiple sources, and the amount of stolen funds continued to rise. As of this writing, the amount of stolen assets from Balancer has increased to over $116 million. Odaily will provide a brief analysis of this matter in this article.

Details of the Balancer theft: Losses exceeded $116 million, primarily due to a vulnerability in the v2 pool smart contract.

According to on-chain information, the Balancer attackers have stolen over $116 million, primarily in the form of WETH, wstETH, osETH, frxETH, rsETH, and rETH, distributed across multiple chains including ETH, Base, and Sonic.

• Assets stolen from the Ethereum blockchain: approximately $100 million;

• Nearly $8 million in assets stolen from the Arbitrum blockchain;

• Stolen assets on the Base blockchain: nearly $3.95 million;

• Stolen assets on the Sonic blockchain: Over $3.4 million;

• Optimism on-chain stolen assets: nearly $1.57 million;

• Stolen assets on the Polygon blockchain: approximately $230,000.

Crypto KOL Adi reported that preliminary investigations indicate the attack primarily targeted Balancer's V2 vaults and liquidity pools, exploiting vulnerabilities in smart contract interactions. On-chain investigators pointed out that a maliciously deployed contract manipulated Vault calls during liquidity pool initialization. Incorrect authorization and callback handling allowed the attacker to bypass safeguards, enabling unauthorized swaps or balance manipulation between interconnected liquidity pools, resulting in the rapid theft of assets within minutes.

Based on the available information, there is no private key leak; this is purely a smart contract vulnerability.

Kebabsec auditor and Citrea developer @okkothejawa also posted, stating that "(the check error mentioned by @moo9000) may not be the root cause, because ops.sender == msg.sender in all 'manageUserBalance' calls. The security vulnerability may have occurred in a transaction before the contract for withdrawing assets was created, as it caused some state changes in the Balancer vault."

Balancer has responded, stating, "The official team is aware of the potential vulnerability affecting Balancer v2 pools. Our engineering and security teams are investigating this as a high priority. We will share verified updates and follow-up steps as soon as we obtain more information."

Berachain, which faces potential asset damage risks, responded immediately. Following the Berachain Foundation's statement, Berachain founder Smokey The Bera stated that "the Bera node group has proactively suspended the operation of the public chain to prevent the Balancer vulnerability from affecting BEX (mainly the USDe three pools)."

• Have the Ethena team disable Bera bridging.

• USDe deposits are disabled/suspended in the lending market.

• Suspension of HONEY token minting and exchange

• Communicate with CEX and other entities to ensure that the hacker's address is blacklisted.

Our goal is to recover funds as quickly as possible and ensure the safety of all LPs. The Berachain team will release the binary to relevant node validators and service providers as soon as it is ready (this involves some slot refactoring, etc., and not just modifying the Bera token balance, as the pool contains non-native assets).

For detailed on-chain information regarding the Balancer attacker, please see: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/cd756cb8-6a84-4f40-9361-f6c548544430

The Balancer hack has alarmed crypto whales the most.

As a long-established DeFi protocol, Balancer users are undoubtedly the most directly affected by this theft. For users now, the following actions can be taken:

• Withdraw funds from the Balancer v2 pool to prevent further losses;

• Revoke authorization: Use Revoke, DeBank, or Etherscan to revoke smart contract permissions for a Balancer address to avoid potential security risks;

• Stay alert: Closely monitor the Balancer attackers' next move and whether it will have a cascading impact on other DeFi protocols.

In addition, a crypto whale that had been dormant for three years was among the victims that attracted market attention during this theft.

According to LookonChain monitoring, a crypto whale, 0x0090, which had been dormant for three years, has just awakened after the Balancer platform vulnerability occurred, and is eager to withdraw its $6.5 million worth of assets from Balancer. On-chain information can be found at: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x009023dA14A3C9f448B75f33cEb9291c21373bD8

Follow-up developments: Hackers begin token exchange scheme

According to on-chain analyst Ember, the hackers involved in the Balancer theft have begun attempting to exchange numerous Liquidity Staking Tokens (LST) for ETH. Previously, they exchanged 10 osETH for 10.55 ETH.

On-chain information shows that hackers are using Cow Protocol to continuously exchange stolen assets across multiple blockchains for assets such as ETH and USDC. Currently, the chances of recovering these stolen assets appear slim.

Odaily will continue to follow up on whether Balancer can find the vulnerability in the protocol contract in time and recover the stolen assets or provide a corresponding solution.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Unsecured stablecoin lending: a vision

Unsecured stablecoin lending: a vision

Article author: haonan Article compiled by: Block unicorn Foreword Users of the global unsecured consumer credit market are like fat sheep in modern finance—slow to act, lacking judgment, and lacking mathematical ability. As unsecured consumer credit shifts to the stablecoin track, its operating mechanism will change, and new participants will have the opportunity to get a share of the pie. Huge market In the United States, the primary form of unsecured lending is credit cards: this ubiquitous, highly liquid, and instantly available credit instrument allows consumers to borrow money without providing collateral when making purchases. Outstanding credit card debt continues to grow and has now reached approximately $1.21 trillion. outdated technology The last major transformation in the credit card lending sector occurred in the 1990s when Capital One introduced a risk-based pricing model, a groundbreaking move that reshaped the landscape of consumer credit. Since then, despite the emergence of numerous new banks and fintech companies, the structure of the credit card industry has remained largely unchanged. However, the emergence of stablecoins and on-chain credit protocols has brought new foundations to the industry: programmable money, transparent markets, and real-time funding. They promise to ultimately disrupt this cycle, redefining how credit is generated, financed, and repaid in a digital, borderless economic environment. In today's bank card payment systems, there is a time lag between authorization (transaction approval) and settlement (the issuing institution transferring funds to the merchant through the card network). By moving the funds processing flow onto the blockchain, these receivables can be tokenized and financed in real time. Imagine a consumer purchases goods worth $5,000. The transaction is immediately authorized. Before settling with Visa or Mastercard, the issuing institution tokenizes the receivables on-chain and receives $5,000 worth of USDC from a decentralized credit pool. Once settlement is complete, the issuing institution sends these funds to the merchant. Subsequently, when the borrower makes a repayment, the repayment amount will be automatically returned to the on-chain lender via a smart contract. Again, the entire process is conducted in real time. This approach enables real-time liquidity, transparent funding sources, and automatic repayments, thereby reducing counterparty risk and eliminating many of the manual processes that still exist in today's consumer credit. From securitization to fund pooling For decades, the consumer credit market has relied on deposits and securitization to enable large-scale lending. Banks and credit card issuers package thousands of receivables into asset-backed securities (ABS) and then sell them to institutional investors. This structure provides ample liquidity but also introduces complexity and opacity. "Buy Now, Pay Later" (BNPL) lenders like Affirm and Afterpay have demonstrated the evolution of credit approval processes. Instead of offering a universal credit line, they review each transaction at the point of sale, differentiating between a $10,000 sofa and a $200 pair of sneakers. This transaction-level risk control produces standardized, divisible accounts receivable, with each receivable having a clearly defined borrower, term, and risk profile, making it an ideal choice for real-time matching through on-chain lending pools. On-chain lending can be further expanded by creating dedicated credit pools tailored to specific borrower demographics or product categories. For example, one credit pool could fund small transactions for high-quality borrowers, while another could specifically offer travel installment plans for less-than-ideal consumers. Over time, these pools of funds may evolve into targeted credit markets that enable dynamic pricing and provide transparent performance metrics for all participants. This programmability opens the door to more efficient capital allocation, better interest rates for consumers, and the establishment of an open, transparent, and instantly auditable global market for unsecured consumer credit. Emerging on-chain credit stack Reimagining unsecured lending for the on-chain era is not simply about porting credit products to the blockchain; it requires fundamentally rebuilding the entire credit infrastructure. Beyond card issuers and processors, the traditional lending ecosystem relies on a complex network of intermediaries: We need new ways of credit scoring. Traditional credit scoring systems, such as FICO and VantageScore, may be ported to the blockchain, but decentralized identity and reputation systems may play a greater role. Lenders will also need credit assessments, which are equivalent to ratings from S&P, Moody's, or Fitch, to evaluate approval quality and repayment performance. Finally, the less visible but crucial aspects of loan collection also need improvement. Stablecoin-denominated debt still requires enforcement mechanisms and recovery processes that combine on-chain automation with off-chain legal frameworks. Stablecoins have bridged the gap between fiat currency and on-chain spending. Lending protocols and tokenized money market funds are redefining savings and returns. Bringing unsecured credit on-chain completes this triangle, enabling consumers to borrow seamlessly and investors to fund credit in a transparent manner—all powered by open financial infrastructure.
Share
PANews2025/11/04 15:00