TLDR Retail investors lost $17B chasing Bitcoin exposure via treasury firms. Metaplanet and Strategy stocks dropped up to 50% during Bitcoin’s fall. Treasury firms traded 40–50% above Bitcoin value before the crash. Losses were concentrated among investors in the US, Japan, and Europe Retail investors chasing Bitcoin exposure through corporate treasury stocks have seen $17 [...] The post Bitcoin proxy bets through treasury firms wipe out 17 billion losses appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Retail investors lost $17B chasing Bitcoin exposure via treasury firms. Metaplanet and Strategy stocks dropped up to 50% during Bitcoin’s fall. Treasury firms traded 40–50% above Bitcoin value before the crash. Losses were concentrated among investors in the US, Japan, and Europe Retail investors chasing Bitcoin exposure through corporate treasury stocks have seen $17 [...] The post Bitcoin proxy bets through treasury firms wipe out 17 billion losses appeared first on CoinCentral.

Bitcoin proxy bets through treasury firms wipe out 17 billion losses

2025/10/19 04:20

TLDR

  • Retail investors lost $17B chasing Bitcoin exposure via treasury firms.
  • Metaplanet and Strategy stocks dropped up to 50% during Bitcoin’s fall.
  • Treasury firms traded 40–50% above Bitcoin value before the crash.
  • Losses were concentrated among investors in the US, Japan, and Europe

Retail investors chasing Bitcoin exposure through corporate treasury stocks have seen $17 billion erased in a few months. The idea of owning Bitcoin through public companies such as Metaplanet and Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) seemed safer and simpler. But when Bitcoin’s rally cooled and valuations corrected, these stocks fell twice as hard, leaving investors with steep losses and a harsh reminder about indirect exposure.

The Rise of Corporate Bitcoin Treasuries

During Bitcoin’s surge in late 2024 and early 2025, several firms adopted the “digital asset treasury” model. They used company balance sheets to buy large amounts of Bitcoin, pitching themselves as accessible Bitcoin proxies. Strategy, led by Michael Saylor, became the symbol of this movement, inspiring others like Japan’s Metaplanet to follow the same approach.

According to 10X Research, by mid-2025 dozens of small and mid-cap firms had rebranded around their Bitcoin holdings. Investors bought these stocks to gain exposure without managing digital wallets or using exchange-traded funds. However, the equities began trading at large premiums—sometimes 40% to 50% higher than their actual Bitcoin per-share value. Analysts at Bloomberg described this as “a shift from Bitcoin exposure to exposure to crowd psychology.”

When Valuations Collapsed

The turning point came in October 2025 when Bitcoin fell about 13%. The decline triggered amplified losses in these treasury firms. Strategy’s stock dropped nearly 35% from its peak, while Metaplanet lost over half its market value. The corrections erased most of the summer’s speculative gains and deepened retail losses.

10X Research reported that retail portfolios tied to these digital asset treasuries collectively lost around $17 billion since August. The losses were concentrated among individual investors in the United States, Japan, and Europe. The research described the situation as a “proxy trade gone wrong,” where enthusiasm replaced sound valuation metrics.

Why the Proxies Failed

The core issue was valuation drift. As Bitcoin prices climbed, investors bid up treasury stocks far beyond their intrinsic Bitcoin holdings. When sentiment turned, the same leverage worked in reverse, magnifying declines. These companies were effectively leveraged plays on Bitcoin, funded through debt and equity issuance.

Bitcoin was designed for self-custody and decentralization, yet retail investors found themselves holding corporate intermediaries again. “Equity wrappers for digital assets are not substitutes for the assets themselves,” the 10X Research report stated. The ease of buying shares through stock exchanges came at the cost of higher risk and volatility.

The Broader Market Response

Bloomberg noted that this event could reshape how retail participants approach crypto-related equities. Traders who saw these companies as safer Bitcoin alternatives were reminded of the difference between holding Bitcoin directly and owning companies that speculate on it.

Market data show that after the sell-off, some professional traders began shorting overvalued Bitcoin treasury stocks while going long on Bitcoin itself. Analysts described this as a rebalancing phase, where valuation gaps between equity proxies and spot Bitcoin began to narrow.

This episode also renewed focus on exchange-traded funds and regulated Bitcoin products, which many now see as more transparent vehicles for exposure. For many retail investors, the $17 billion loss serves as a clear warning about the cost of convenience and the risks of treating speculative equities as Bitcoin substitutes.

The post Bitcoin proxy bets through treasury firms wipe out 17 billion losses appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39
Share