The post China’s EV insurance market bleeds billions as claims surge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China’s once-booming electric vehicle (EV) insurance business is fast becoming a money-losing sector. Claims are growing faster than expected, and insurers are losing billions of yuan annually. The issue is that EV adoption in the country has outpaced insurers’ antiquated tools to price risk. As a result, one of the world’s most advanced EV markets has become a battleground for insurers. China has the world’s largest number of EVs on the road. More than 20 million new energy vehicles (NEVs), including pure electric cars and plug-in hybrids, are registered nationwide. And sales continue to soar, with EVs now outselling gasoline cars in several cities. Yet behind the surge, insurance statistics paint a chilling reality. Owners of electric vehicles, many younger than motorists who pilot traditional internal combustion, are roughly twice as likely to file claims on their policies. Their vehicles are also much pricier to repair. Batteries account for roughly a third of a car’s value and are most at risk. These units are mounted under the floor and can more easily be damaged by speed bumps or road detritus. And new ones aren’t cheap; sometimes, replacing one is more than it would cost to repair the entire rest of the car combined. Specialized components like sensors and chips have become more expensive and difficult to find. And often repairs can only be made by authorized service centers, many at Tesla-certified body shops, where costs are all too expensive. In China, insurers lost 5.7 billion yuan ($802 million) on underwriting EV policies in 2024 alone, according to the China Association of Actuaries. Total premium income was almost 141 billion yuan, but claims and repair costs outweighed profits. Qin Lu, the chief executive officer of Greater China at Aon Plc, said insurers could not fully distinguish between car brands, models, and… The post China’s EV insurance market bleeds billions as claims surge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China’s once-booming electric vehicle (EV) insurance business is fast becoming a money-losing sector. Claims are growing faster than expected, and insurers are losing billions of yuan annually. The issue is that EV adoption in the country has outpaced insurers’ antiquated tools to price risk. As a result, one of the world’s most advanced EV markets has become a battleground for insurers. China has the world’s largest number of EVs on the road. More than 20 million new energy vehicles (NEVs), including pure electric cars and plug-in hybrids, are registered nationwide. And sales continue to soar, with EVs now outselling gasoline cars in several cities. Yet behind the surge, insurance statistics paint a chilling reality. Owners of electric vehicles, many younger than motorists who pilot traditional internal combustion, are roughly twice as likely to file claims on their policies. Their vehicles are also much pricier to repair. Batteries account for roughly a third of a car’s value and are most at risk. These units are mounted under the floor and can more easily be damaged by speed bumps or road detritus. And new ones aren’t cheap; sometimes, replacing one is more than it would cost to repair the entire rest of the car combined. Specialized components like sensors and chips have become more expensive and difficult to find. And often repairs can only be made by authorized service centers, many at Tesla-certified body shops, where costs are all too expensive. In China, insurers lost 5.7 billion yuan ($802 million) on underwriting EV policies in 2024 alone, according to the China Association of Actuaries. Total premium income was almost 141 billion yuan, but claims and repair costs outweighed profits. Qin Lu, the chief executive officer of Greater China at Aon Plc, said insurers could not fully distinguish between car brands, models, and…

China’s EV insurance market bleeds billions as claims surge

2025/09/22 14:21

China’s once-booming electric vehicle (EV) insurance business is fast becoming a money-losing sector. Claims are growing faster than expected, and insurers are losing billions of yuan annually.

The issue is that EV adoption in the country has outpaced insurers’ antiquated tools to price risk. As a result, one of the world’s most advanced EV markets has become a battleground for insurers.

China has the world’s largest number of EVs on the road. More than 20 million new energy vehicles (NEVs), including pure electric cars and plug-in hybrids, are registered nationwide. And sales continue to soar, with EVs now outselling gasoline cars in several cities.

Yet behind the surge, insurance statistics paint a chilling reality. Owners of electric vehicles, many younger than motorists who pilot traditional internal combustion, are roughly twice as likely to file claims on their policies. Their vehicles are also much pricier to repair.

Batteries account for roughly a third of a car’s value and are most at risk. These units are mounted under the floor and can more easily be damaged by speed bumps or road detritus. And new ones aren’t cheap; sometimes, replacing one is more than it would cost to repair the entire rest of the car combined.

Specialized components like sensors and chips have become more expensive and difficult to find. And often repairs can only be made by authorized service centers, many at Tesla-certified body shops, where costs are all too expensive.

In China, insurers lost 5.7 billion yuan ($802 million) on underwriting EV policies in 2024 alone, according to the China Association of Actuaries. Total premium income was almost 141 billion yuan, but claims and repair costs outweighed profits.

Qin Lu, the chief executive officer of Greater China at Aon Plc, said insurers could not fully distinguish between car brands, models, and loss patterns, adding that the sector remained challenging. He predicted it could take about three more years before businesses could break even.

Regulators attempt fixes as losses pile up

The mounting losses have drawn the attention of regulators. In January 2025, China issued its first insurance guide for EVs and plug-in hybrids. The goal is to create uniform coverage, lower repair costs, and pressure carmakers to work with insurers.

Automakers are packing their vehicles with copious amounts of data about battery health, driving patterns, and vehicle usage. However, insurers have had little access to it, complicating their ability to build accurate risk models. The new rules promote the sharing of data across industries to allow insurers to price policies more equitably.

The government also initiated an online service called “Easy to Insure,” which matches up EV owners with insurance coverage. The platform has helped cover over 500,000 vehicles with policies with a combined value of nearly 495 billion yuan. And while it wouldn’t guarantee the lowest premiums, it would guarantee that you can’t be denied basic coverage.

At the same time, law enforcement officials are pressuring car manufacturers and their parts suppliers to lower prices for replacement parts. A more transparent repair and supply chain should drive down costs, even if progress has been achingly slow.

Automakers enter a market too big to ignore

EV insurance isn’t profitable yet, but it’s seen as the industry’s future. Analysts expect premiums in this industry to hit 500 billion yuan by 2030, more than a third of China’s auto insurance market.

The three biggest insurers, Ping An, PICC, and China Pacific Insurance, have more than 65% of the sector’s market share. Smaller companies have difficulty keeping pace and may lack scale or good data to manage risks effectively.

Ping An said its EV business became profitable in 2024, powered by new tools that identify ride-hailing drivers and analyze the economics of a repair. Other insurers are also playing with usage-based pricing, under which policies would be based on real-time driving data.

The likes of BYD, Tesla, and newcomers like Xiaomi are all establishing their own insurance arms amid a growing bet that vertically integrating in the business could provide them an edge.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/chinas-ev-insurance-market-bleeds-billions/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Ledger Eyes New York IPO as Hardware Wallet Demand Surges

Ledger Eyes New York IPO as Hardware Wallet Demand Surges

French cryptocurrency hardware wallet manufacturer Ledger is reportedly exploring an IPO in New York or a fundraising round. While demand for self-custody solutions is climbing amid rising digital asset theft, the move signals growing confidence in the sector’s monetization potential. Market Timing Reflects Crypto Cycle Dynamics Ledger’s IPO exploration comes as the hardware wallet sector experiences renewed momentum. Security concerns and regulatory shifts are driving this growth. Industry data shows $2.17 billion in cryptocurrency stolen during the first half of 2025, surpassing the total for 2024. The timing also aligns with the broader crypto market recovery. It comes amid anticipated regulatory clarity under the current US administration. Unlike Coinbase’s April 2021 debut near a market peak, Ledger appears positioned differently. The company can capitalize on sustained institutional adoption rather than retail speculation. Hardware wallet penetration among cryptocurrency holders remains below 15%. This suggests significant addressable market expansion as digital asset ownership normalizes. Revenue Model Sustainability Under Scrutiny Hardware sales generate initial revenue for the company. However, investors will likely focus on Ledger’s recurring income streams and unit economics. The company manages approximately $100 billion in bitcoin across its customer base. Yet monetizing this relationship beyond one-time device purchases presents challenges. Recent moves to introduce transaction-based fees indicate efforts to build subscription-like revenue. These include a controversial multisig application charging $10 plus 0.05% per transaction. Such initiatives have faced community resistance due to concerns about centralization. Comparable publicly traded crypto infrastructure companies trade at 5-8x revenue multiples. Hardware-centric models typically command lower valuations than software platforms. This stems from inventory risk and margin compression. Ledger’s ability to demonstrate customer lifetime value will be crucial. Software upgrades, premium features, or enterprise custody services could help. These factors will likely determine investor appetite and valuation ranges for any potential Ledger IPO in New York. New York Venue Signals Capital Access Strategy The preference for a New York IPO over European exchanges reflects a pragmatic assessment, despite Ledger’s Paris headquarters being geographically close. It considers liquidity and the composition of the investor base. US markets currently host the majority of crypto-focused institutional capital. Bitcoin ETFs alone recorded $25.9 billion in year-to-date inflows through October 2025. This demonstrates sustained institutional appetite, whereas European bourses lack comparable depth in crypto-specialized investors. They also suffer from fragmented liquidity across national exchanges. A US listing provides natural currency alignment for the business. The company generates substantial dollar-denominated revenue. It also positions Ledger alongside American crypto infrastructure peers. However, the company must navigate SEC disclosure requirements. Ongoing regulatory evolution regarding digital asset classifications adds further complexity. These factors have deterred some European fintech firms from entering the US markets.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/10 09:12