The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released a statement on new cryptocurrency regulations. The intentions of these guidelines ought to be clear; they should provide a defined picture of what is considered legal and illegal for companies operating in crypto, allowing innovation while protecting consumers and upholding market integrity.  The move will be […]The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released a statement on new cryptocurrency regulations. The intentions of these guidelines ought to be clear; they should provide a defined picture of what is considered legal and illegal for companies operating in crypto, allowing innovation while protecting consumers and upholding market integrity.  The move will be […]

FCA Crypto Regulation: Striking a Balance Between Innovation and Consumer Safety

2025/09/18 12:00
FCA Crypto Regulation
  • FCA crypto regulations aim to strike a balance, bringing innovation, protection, and balance to the marketplace.
  • The FCA crypto regulation rendering firms to be under FCA supervision in order to conform to the industry standards
  • FCA seeks public input on the handling of complaints and the application of “Consumer Duty” on crypto companies.

The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released a statement on new cryptocurrency regulations. The intentions of these guidelines ought to be clear; they should provide a defined picture of what is considered legal and illegal for companies operating in crypto, allowing innovation while protecting consumers and upholding market integrity. 

The move will be the latest step in the UK authorities’ regulation of digital currencies. In a report published on Wednesday, the FCA suggests new minimum standards for crypto firms. Surely, if these rules are implemented, the crypto space would be overseen by the FCA. 

Also Read: UK FCA Opens Retail Crypto ETNs Access, Derivatives Remain Banned

David Geale, Executive Director of Payments and Digital Finance at FCA, said: “Businesses that have applied for registration prior to the 16 December deadline and are listed on the Financial Services Register will be able to continue trading under the FCA’s temporary registration regime while waiting for their applications to be processed. When the proposed legislation becomes effective, a new UA check will no longer be performed.

Risks and Stability Covered in FCA Crypto Regulations

The FCA crypto regulation won’t make the investment risks associated with crypto go away. However, they will benefit businesses in providing more transparent products for those interested in crypto investments.

Geale said the consultation paper compared these new measures to traditional bank standards. Many of these regulations are concerned with operational resiliency and financial crime. These are critical gaps that need to be filled in order for the crypto space to work securely.

The handling of complaints is another major issue of the FCA crypto regulation. The FCA is a regulator, and the act called the ” Financial Ombudsman Service” is the agency currently responsible for accepting complaints about consumers and their treatment by financial services firms. This may potentially bring higher levels of consumer trust for crypto companies.

FCA Considers “Consumer Duty” for Crypto in Light of Global Cooperation

The consultation paper is looking for feedback on the “Consumer Duty” which requires all financial companies to act in the best interests of their customers following FCA crypto regulations. The FCA is considering applying this rule to crypto companies. 

This followed the creation of a crypto bill by the UK government in April. The bill would subject crypto exchanges and dealers to the same financial regulatory firewalls applied to all other financial service firms.

The UK has made it clear that it was not ‘open for business’ and was intent on addressing crypto fraud and abuse. This indicates that the country is committed to regulating the crypto space while at the same time opening space for innovation and development. These regulations are considered essential to guarantee an equal playing field in the cryptocurrency industry.

Also, there is growing international crypto regulation cooperation. The United Kingdom and the US have been working on ways they could tighten their cooperation on digital currencies. 

These discussions have included members from leading crypto companies such as Coinbase and Ripple, as well as banks such as Bank of America and Barclays, suggesting that there is an increasing global impetus to regulate crypto.

A significant impact on the digital asset industry could result from the FCA crypto regulation. The goal is to strike a balance between innovation and consumer protection. However, public feedback would be important in determining the UK’s approach to conducting these rules; public sentiment shapes the direction of crypto regulation in the UK.

Also Read: UK Moves In on Crypto, What the FCA’s Plan Could Mean for the Market

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Cyber Hornet seeks SEC nod for S&P 500 ETFs tied to XRP, Ethereum, Solana

Cyber Hornet seeks SEC nod for S&P 500 ETFs tied to XRP, Ethereum, Solana

The post Cyber Hornet seeks SEC nod for S&P 500 ETFs tied to XRP, Ethereum, Solana appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Cyber Hornet has filed with the SEC to launch a unique ETF that combines exposure to the S&P 500 with XRP. If approved, the fund will be known under the ticker “XXX”. It is meant to provide investors returns that closely correspond to an index of the S&P 500 and another tracking futures contracts for XRP – called the S&P XRP Futures 75/25 Blend Index. In its structure, 75% of the Cyber Hornet ETF portfolio will be allocated to S&P 500 stocks, while the remaining 25% goes into XRP futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. The fund can also hold XRP directly or use ETPs to balance its exposure. Cyber Hornet listed two other similar offerings in its SEC filing Cyber Hornet also has two more ETFs in the works for Ethereum and Solana. The Ethereum version will be listed as “EEE,” and the Solana one as “SSS.” All of the funds have similar 75/25 models, mixing shares with futures contracts. Ethereum exposure comes from CME Ether futures and direct purchases. Meanwhile, the fund’s Solana share will track the S&P Solana Futures Index. This move coincides with growing investor interest — REX-Osprey’s Solana staking ETF just set a new asset record.  Investors will pay a 0.95% management fee annually for the Cyber Hornet ETFs, but there are no shareholder trading fees. The SEC calculates that $10,000 invested would result in about $100 in fees after one year and $312 after three. The ETFs will also rebalance every month to keep the 75/25 split intact, though Cyber Hornet may adjust more frequently if markets get volatile. Moreover, the funds may trade slightly higher or lower than their underlying value, just like most ETFs. The ETFs are also set to trade on Nasdaq if approved. Individual investors will trade shares on the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/27 14:10
Share
How much profit can the “1:1 printing right” of stablecoins bring?

How much profit can the “1:1 printing right” of stablecoins bring?

Written by: RWA Knowledge Circle 1. Stablecoins: The “Private Money Printing Machine” of the Digital Age Over the past year, "stablecoin" has been one of the hottest buzzwords in the capital markets. A stablecoin is a digital currency pegged to a fiat currency, theoretically trading at a 1:1 ratio with the fiat currency and backed by real assets. This raises the question: If large cross-border e-commerce companies issue stablecoins to reduce transaction costs and potentially save tens of millions of yuan annually, that's reasonable. However, in reality, stablecoins are often issued by blockchain platforms and digital service providers. So, how much profit can this "1:1 money printing power" actually generate? Don't underestimate this business. The global stablecoin market landscape is clear: USDT holds a 60% market share, while USDC holds 25%. Tether, the issuer of USDT, has even made headlines: its average employee salary ranks second globally. Bloomberg also reports that it is considering selling a 3% stake for $15-20 billion, valuing it at $500 billion, comparable to OpenAI and SpaceX. Tether, why is it worth this price? (Ranking of average salary of global companies) 2. The “Money Printing Logic” of Stablecoins Traditional banks profit by accepting deposits and lending them out to earn a profit margin. Stablecoin issuers, on the other hand, collect US dollars and mint them into tokens on the blockchain. The money in hand is the source of profit. Circle (USDC issuer): It has a stable operating style and mainly invests in low-risk assets such as US Treasury bonds and cash after receiving funds to ensure a 1:1 exchange rate with the US dollar. Tether (USDT issuer): This model is more aggressive, currently holding $100 billion in reserves and earning over $4 billion annually from interest alone. Net profit is projected to reach $13.7 billion in 2024, with a profit margin of 99%. Tether's portfolio includes not only cash and US Treasury bonds, but also Bitcoin and equity investments, spanning payment infrastructure, renewable energy, artificial intelligence, tokenization, and other fields. To some extent, Tether no longer resembles a simple stablecoin company, but more like a top investment bank and asset management giant. 3. The “Stablecoin War” of DeFi Protocols Once the “printing money model” was discovered to be so profitable, it naturally attracted countless imitators. Many DeFi protocols have joined the stablecoin war: MakerDAO’s DAI: One of the First Successful Decentralized Stablecoins Innovation: It was the first to include U.S. Treasury bonds in its reserves, and at one point held more than $1 billion in short-term Treasury bonds. Revenue Distribution: Excess revenue goes into a surplus buffer, which is then used to repurchase and burn MKR governance tokens. MKR is no longer just a "governance voting right," but is directly tied to cash flow, becoming an "equity token" with real value. Frax: A small but focused "fine money printing machine" Frax's overall scale is not large, and its circulation volume has been maintained below US$500 million for a long time, but its design is extremely sophisticated. Income distribution: A portion is used to destroy FRAX tokens to maintain scarcity; A portion is allocated to stakers to enhance user stickiness; The remaining portion is invested in the sFRAX vault, which tracks the Federal Reserve interest rate, which is equivalent to providing users with a product that "follows U.S. Treasury returns." Although its scale is far smaller than Tether, Frax can still generate tens of millions of dollars in revenue each year, making it a representative example of "small scale and high efficiency". Aave’s GHO: An extension of DeFi lending The well-known lending protocol Aave launched its own stablecoin GHO in 2023. Model: When users borrow GHO, the interest paid goes directly to Aave DAO instead of to external institutions. Income distribution: approximately $20 million in interest income annually; Half of this amount is distributed to AAVE token stakers, and the other half remains in the DAO treasury for community governance and development. The current scale of GHO is approximately US$350 million, but its logic is to deeply integrate stablecoins with lending businesses to form a "vertical ecological closed loop." It can be said that "Eight Immortals crossing the sea, each showing their magical powers", every stablecoin protocol is trying to build its own private money printing machine. 4. Hidden concerns: Is it really stable? Although stablecoins reduce cross-border transaction costs and improve efficiency, they also pose many hidden risks: The anchored asset is not absolutely stable: Tether's reserves include Bitcoin, and once there is a sharp fluctuation, the stablecoin may "break away from the anchor". The revenue distribution process is not transparent: Many agreements claim that the revenue will be used for token repurchase or rewards, but the actual operation process is a "black box". Hedging strategies involve risks: The use of futures hedging models cannot theoretically guarantee 100% safety. Compared with national credit endorsement, the "creditworthiness" of private stablecoins is always limited. 5. Why is Tether worth $500 billion? Given the numerous risks, why is Tether still valued at $500 billion? The answer is: stablecoins have become the infrastructure of the digital age. It's not just a payment and settlement tool; it can also be embedded in scenarios like lending, trading, and RWA (real-world asset tokenization), providing a new channel for global capital circulation. Tether's high valuation actually reflects the market's huge expectations for the future of RWA. Of course, the implementation of compliance supervision is still a key factor in determining how far stablecoins can go in the future. Stablecoins, while seemingly just a cornerstone of the digital currency market, are actually a new form of "coinage" within the financial system. Whether it's Tether's $500 billion valuation or the proliferation of DeFi protocols, they remind us that the monetary landscape of the digital age is quietly being rewritten.
Share
PANews2025/09/27 14:13
Share