Elon Musk spent most of his time at Tesla’s third-quarter earnings call arguing for his controversial $1 trillion pay package while snapping at shareholder advisory firms that dared to oppose it. “There needs to be enough voting control to give a strong influence, but not so much that I can’t be fired if I go […]Elon Musk spent most of his time at Tesla’s third-quarter earnings call arguing for his controversial $1 trillion pay package while snapping at shareholder advisory firms that dared to oppose it. “There needs to be enough voting control to give a strong influence, but not so much that I can’t be fired if I go […]

Tesla Q3 earnings miss forecasts as Musk clashes with critics over $1T payout

2025/10/24 01:49

Elon Musk spent most of his time at Tesla’s third-quarter earnings call arguing for his controversial $1 trillion pay package while snapping at shareholder advisory firms that dared to oppose it.

“There needs to be enough voting control to give a strong influence, but not so much that I can’t be fired if I go insane,” Elon said, cutting off his own chief financial officer as the call wrapped after more than an hour. The vote on his record-breaking pay will happen at Tesla’s annual meeting in Austin on November 6.

The call, which started calmly, turned heated when Elon brushed through numbers to chat about his usual tech dreams: AI, humanoid robots, and self-driving software. But for all the futuristic talk, the short-term numbers were less exciting.

Adjusted earnings landed at 50 cents per share, missing the 54-cent estimate. Revenue, however, climbed to $28.1 billion, beating expectations of $26.37 billion. The company’s automotive revenue jumped 6% year over year, rising from $20 billion to $21.2 billion.

The uptick came largely from buyers rushing in before federal EV tax credits expired, a tailwind that may not repeat in the next quarter.

Analysts dissect Tesla’s Q3 report and forecasts

Colin Langan from Wells Fargo kept an underweight rating and a brutal $120 price target, suggesting a 73% downside from Tesla’s last close. He said Tesla threw out “an array of promises for 2026, including robots, semitruck ramps in the second half of 2026, and fully autonomous cybercabs by Q2 2026.”

But he warned the company’s “core business is deteriorating” while Robotaxi and Optimus are likely to take longer to scale.

At UBS, analysts slapped a sell rating with a $247 target, roughly 44% below Tesla’s market value. They said Elon’s team gave “very little in terms of near-term outlook,” calling it “purposeful.” They argued Tesla is trying to move from being a car company to an AI company, but the market already values the AI side at around $900 billion, which leaves little room for mistakes.

Jefferies was less harsh, keeping a hold rating and $300 target, saying Tesla had a “slight EBIT and margin miss after $238 million in non-recurring charges,” but strong free cash flow of $4 billion, boosted by a $2.1 billion working capital inflow. The firm said Tesla’s auto business no longer drives valuation but continues to fund future AI and robotics projects.

Wall Street splits on Elon’s $1T payday and AI narrative

Barclays called it “irrelevant that Tesla missed EPS,” assigning an equal weight rating and a $350 target. The bank said Elon’s focus is now clearly on autonomy and robots, not traditional vehicles.

Goldman Sachs maintained a neutral rating and a $400 target, expecting earnings growth to come from autonomy and robotics, though warned that Elon might be too optimistic in a client note sent on Friday.

Meanwhile, Adam Jonas of Morgan Stanley, one of Elon’s most vocal supporters, gave Tesla an overweight rating with a $410 target, roughly 7% below its recent close. Jonas said “margins were in line” while “$4 billion in free cash flow was triple consensus,” adding Tesla is “navigating a dignified exit from the steering-wheel-having auto business.”

Adam said Tesla’s fate now hinges on Elon’s ability to “steal the fire on autonomy” amid competition from the Mag 7 tech group.

Deutsche Bank analyst Emmanuel Rosner took the most optimistic tone, raising his target slightly from $435 to $440 per share and keeping a buy rating. He said Elon “is clearly dialed in,” adding that the passing of his compensation package “will be important in ensuring that continues.”

Emmanuel said Robotaxi and Optimus are progressing slower than expected but added that the next version of Full Self-Driving software (v14) could mark a turning point. He also said Tesla “may ultimately prove to be the only Western company capable of manufacturing humanoids at scale.”

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

The Federal Reserve cuts interest rates for the first time this year. A look at the opinions of dovish and hawkish analysts.

The Federal Reserve cuts interest rates for the first time this year. A look at the opinions of dovish and hawkish analysts.

By Chloe, ChainCatcher At 2:00 AM on September 18th, the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) announced a 25 basis point interest rate cut, lowering the range from 4.25% to 4.50% to 4.00% to 4.25%. After five consecutive meetings this year where rates remained unchanged, this was the first rate cut by the Fed since December of last year, and is expected to usher in a new round of rate cuts. ChainCatcher simply summarizes the key points of the FOMC interest rate decision meeting, Powell's speech, the outlook for the US economy, and feedback from major institutions and analysts. More than 70% of officials prefer to cut interest rates 1 to 3 times by 2025. The Federal Open Market Committee voted 11-1 to cut the benchmark interest rate by one basis point. New Fed Governor Stephen Miran, appointed by President Trump and officially sworn in on the 16th after a rapid Senate vote, was the lone vote against the decision. Miran argued for a more aggressive rate cut, a 50 basis point reduction at once, rather than the 25 basis points ultimately adopted. His call for more aggressive easing is reflected in the single lower projection in the dot plot, indicating support for a cumulative rate cut of 150 basis points by year-end. Forecasts indicate the Fed is expected to cut interest rates by another 75 basis points in 2025, highlighting its growing concerns about the balance of risks. While the Federal Open Market Committee emphasized its commitment to its 2% inflation target, its tone was more supportive of growth and employment amidst slowing economic momentum. After collating data from 19 officials who participated in the FOMC meeting, the majority (76.3%) preferred to cut interest rates one to three times by 2025. About half (47.4%) of them supported a 75 basis point cut, or three times, while another 31.6% supported a 25 basis point cut. A minority (5.3%) believed that there would be no more interest rate cuts this year or even supported a substantial 150 basis point cut. This shows that in the context of the economy still showing signs of slowing down and inflationary pressure gradually easing, Federal Reserve officials generally tend to maintain loose monetary policy and expect that there may still be multiple interest rate cuts before the end of the year to stimulate economic growth. The market currently believes that the central bank is preparing the market for a more accommodative policy path, with the future path being completely dovish. However, Bitcoin's reaction has been slow, with price consolidation dominating the overall directional momentum. Powell said after the meeting that he continues to be concerned about inflationary pressures from tariffs. "Our obligation is to ensure that one-time price increases do not become a persistent inflationary problem." Powell also said, "Labor demand has weakened, and the recent pace of job creation appears to be below the break-even level needed to keep the unemployment rate unchanged." When asked whether there would be opportunities for further rate hikes before the end of the year, Powell was cautious, saying the Fed is currently in a "meeting-by-meeting adjustment situation." Institutional Observation Seema Shah, global chief strategist at Principal Asset Management, said: "The dot plot presents a wide range of views, accurately reflecting the complex economic landscape created by changes in the labor supply, concerns about data accuracy, and uncertainty about government policies." A CME Group market trader said: "The FedWatch tool uses the price of 30-day federal funds futures contracts to calculate the market-implied probability of interest rate changes, and estimates that there will be two to three more rate cuts next year." Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset ManagementSM, said: "Next year's dot plot is a mix of views and accurately reflects the complexity of the current economic outlook, including changes in the labor supply, data measurement issues, and government policy volatility and uncertainty, which all add to the confusion." Dovish/Hawkish Analysts' Views Dovish views Michael Gapen (Chief U.S. Economist at Morgan Stanley): "The Fed cut rates by 25 basis points, as expected, and hinted at more cuts to come. The Fed now believes that downside risks to employment have increased, which justifies today's 25 basis point cut and a 75 basis point cut by year-end. The updated forecasts show that inflation is likely to stay above 2.0% for a longer period, with PCE inflation raised from 2.4% to 2.6%. Overall, this is a dovish signal." Blair Shwedo (Bank of America): "The Fed's decision was not surprising, with risk assets and US Treasuries seemingly focused on expectations of two more rate cuts this year. The decision from this meeting should be positive for risk assets overall, and we should see credit spreads remain at historically tight levels." Brian Jacobsen (Chief Economist at Annex Wealth Management) said: "The Fed decision was in line with our expectations, while Milan voted in dissent to call for a larger (50 basis points) rate cut." Hawkish views Michael Rosen (Chief Investment Officer of Angeles Investments) said: "In this decision, the Fed not only lowered interest rates but also raised its forecast for future inflation. This reflects the Fed's desire to stimulate economic activity and increase job opportunities through rate cuts, given the recent slowdown in job growth and a slight increase in the unemployment rate. Furthermore, inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target. Raising the inflation forecast suggests the Fed believes price pressures may be more persistent than previously assumed. This forces the Fed to carefully balance rate cuts with inflationary pressures, avoiding both excessive easing that exacerbates price increases and excessive tightening that further deteriorates the job market." Christopher Hodge (Natixis Chief U.S. Economist): "Powell needs to explain why the dot plot suggests more rate cuts in 2026, even with lower unemployment and higher inflation. The dot plot is a difficult-to-interpret patchwork of projections, and the dovish dots appear to conflict with projected inflation/labor market dynamics." Finally, several analysts noted significant disagreements among Fed officials. Brij Khurana (Wellington Management) noted, "Only Milan dissented, pushing for a 50 basis point rate cut. The market had speculated that both Waller and Bowman would push for a 50 basis point cut at this meeting." Although most officials predicted in the latest dot plot that there is still room for two rate cuts this year, pushing the benchmark rate to 3.5%-3.75%, the market is in a tug-of-war between wait-and-see and disagreement. Mark Malek of Siebert Financial remains cautious about overly optimistic prospects, believing that premature enthusiasm could lead to a more severe sell-off in stocks and bonds, while Peter Cardillo of Spartan Capital views this decision as a dovish signal and expects yields and stocks to continue to rise.
Share
2025/09/19 15:00
Share