Author: fabiano.sol Compiled by: Tim, PANews There are over a dozen projects on Solana that are currently undergoing buybacks, but: Who is conducting 100% buybacks? Who destroys the tokens after the buyback? A complete guide to Solana's ecosystem buyback program. 1.deBridge deBridge is using 100% of its revenue to buy back its own tokens, and the specific handling plan after the buyback is yet to be announced. To date, they have repurchased 3% of the token supply. At this rate, they will be able to repurchase nearly 20% of the circulating supply within a year. 2. Marinede Marinade uses 50% of its monthly revenue to buy back MNDE tokens. Marinade boasts an annualized revenue of $170 million, which could generate significant buying interest for a token with a market capitalization of only $140 million. The future use of these repurchased tokens will be determined by the DAO. 3. Jupiter Jupiter is using 50% of its protocol revenue to buy back its own tokens. They transferred the repurchased tokens to a burn address. To date, Jupiter has repurchased 95 million JUP tokens, representing 1.37% of the total supply. Tomorrow we will discuss a plan for handling the repurchased tokens. 4. Jito The Jito platform will use 1.5% of TipRouter fees to periodically buy back JTO tokens and then burn them. Based on current market prices, this move will result in the repurchase and burning of more than 11 million JTO tokens annually (representing 1.1% of the total supply). 5. Bonk Bonk has introduced several token buyback and burn measures. In this case, I will only focus on LetsBONK. The LetsBONK project will use 50% of its revenue to buy back BONK tokens from the open market and burn them. 6. Metaplex 50% of the protocol's revenue will be allocated to the DAO each month, specifically for MTPLX token buybacks. In the past 30 days, the Metaplex protocol has generated $1.56 million in revenue, of which 50% (i.e., $780,000) was used to buy back approximately 3.5 million MPLX tokens for the Metaplex DAO, representing more than 0.3% of the total supply. 7. Raydium Raydium tokens have an extremely low annual issuance of only 1.9 million (total supply is 555 million). Raydium will use 12% of its transaction fees to buy back RAY tokens. This brings the repurchase ratio to 5% of the current circulating supply. 8. Pump Fun The Pump.fun platform currently generates over $1 million in daily revenue and uses 100% of that revenue to buy back tokens. In September, they bought back $55 million worth of PUMP tokens, which would allow them to buy back approximately 30% of the circulating supply within a year. 9. Streamflow 39% of the Streamflow protocol's revenue is being used to buy back STREAM tokens and distribute them to stakers. Taking July 2025 as an example, this means that 39% of the $247,000 in revenue that month (i.e., $96,330) will be used for STREAM token buybacks and staking reward distributions. Recently, Magic Eden also launched a token buyback mechanism, which has repurchased 111,000 ME tokens and will use them all for staking rewards (the scale is expected to expand further in the future). Step Finance has also invested all of its platform revenue (including revenue from businesses such as Solanafloor and Remora Markets) into token buybacks.Author: fabiano.sol Compiled by: Tim, PANews There are over a dozen projects on Solana that are currently undergoing buybacks, but: Who is conducting 100% buybacks? Who destroys the tokens after the buyback? A complete guide to Solana's ecosystem buyback program. 1.deBridge deBridge is using 100% of its revenue to buy back its own tokens, and the specific handling plan after the buyback is yet to be announced. To date, they have repurchased 3% of the token supply. At this rate, they will be able to repurchase nearly 20% of the circulating supply within a year. 2. Marinede Marinade uses 50% of its monthly revenue to buy back MNDE tokens. Marinade boasts an annualized revenue of $170 million, which could generate significant buying interest for a token with a market capitalization of only $140 million. The future use of these repurchased tokens will be determined by the DAO. 3. Jupiter Jupiter is using 50% of its protocol revenue to buy back its own tokens. They transferred the repurchased tokens to a burn address. To date, Jupiter has repurchased 95 million JUP tokens, representing 1.37% of the total supply. Tomorrow we will discuss a plan for handling the repurchased tokens. 4. Jito The Jito platform will use 1.5% of TipRouter fees to periodically buy back JTO tokens and then burn them. Based on current market prices, this move will result in the repurchase and burning of more than 11 million JTO tokens annually (representing 1.1% of the total supply). 5. Bonk Bonk has introduced several token buyback and burn measures. In this case, I will only focus on LetsBONK. The LetsBONK project will use 50% of its revenue to buy back BONK tokens from the open market and burn them. 6. Metaplex 50% of the protocol's revenue will be allocated to the DAO each month, specifically for MTPLX token buybacks. In the past 30 days, the Metaplex protocol has generated $1.56 million in revenue, of which 50% (i.e., $780,000) was used to buy back approximately 3.5 million MPLX tokens for the Metaplex DAO, representing more than 0.3% of the total supply. 7. Raydium Raydium tokens have an extremely low annual issuance of only 1.9 million (total supply is 555 million). Raydium will use 12% of its transaction fees to buy back RAY tokens. This brings the repurchase ratio to 5% of the current circulating supply. 8. Pump Fun The Pump.fun platform currently generates over $1 million in daily revenue and uses 100% of that revenue to buy back tokens. In September, they bought back $55 million worth of PUMP tokens, which would allow them to buy back approximately 30% of the circulating supply within a year. 9. Streamflow 39% of the Streamflow protocol's revenue is being used to buy back STREAM tokens and distribute them to stakers. Taking July 2025 as an example, this means that 39% of the $247,000 in revenue that month (i.e., $96,330) will be used for STREAM token buybacks and staking reward distributions. Recently, Magic Eden also launched a token buyback mechanism, which has repurchased 111,000 ME tokens and will use them all for staking rewards (the scale is expected to expand further in the future). Step Finance has also invested all of its platform revenue (including revenue from businesses such as Solanafloor and Remora Markets) into token buybacks.

Solana Ecosystem Buyback Guide: Decoding the Buyback Mechanisms and Real Impact of 9 Major Projects

2025/10/30 16:25

Author: fabiano.sol

Compiled by: Tim, PANews

There are over a dozen projects on Solana that are currently undergoing buybacks, but:

  • Who is conducting 100% buybacks?
  • Who destroys the tokens after the buyback?

A complete guide to Solana's ecosystem buyback program.

1.deBridge

deBridge is using 100% of its revenue to buy back its own tokens, and the specific handling plan after the buyback is yet to be announced.

To date, they have repurchased 3% of the token supply. At this rate, they will be able to repurchase nearly 20% of the circulating supply within a year.

2. Marinede

Marinade uses 50% of its monthly revenue to buy back MNDE tokens.

Marinade boasts an annualized revenue of $170 million, which could generate significant buying interest for a token with a market capitalization of only $140 million.

The future use of these repurchased tokens will be determined by the DAO.

3. Jupiter

Jupiter is using 50% of its protocol revenue to buy back its own tokens.

They transferred the repurchased tokens to a burn address. To date, Jupiter has repurchased 95 million JUP tokens, representing 1.37% of the total supply.

Tomorrow we will discuss a plan for handling the repurchased tokens.

4. Jito

The Jito platform will use 1.5% of TipRouter fees to periodically buy back JTO tokens and then burn them.

Based on current market prices, this move will result in the repurchase and burning of more than 11 million JTO tokens annually (representing 1.1% of the total supply).

5. Bonk

Bonk has introduced several token buyback and burn measures.

In this case, I will only focus on LetsBONK.

The LetsBONK project will use 50% of its revenue to buy back BONK tokens from the open market and burn them.

6. Metaplex

50% of the protocol's revenue will be allocated to the DAO each month, specifically for MTPLX token buybacks.

In the past 30 days, the Metaplex protocol has generated $1.56 million in revenue, of which 50% (i.e., $780,000) was used to buy back approximately 3.5 million MPLX tokens for the Metaplex DAO, representing more than 0.3% of the total supply.

7. Raydium

Raydium tokens have an extremely low annual issuance of only 1.9 million (total supply is 555 million).

Raydium will use 12% of its transaction fees to buy back RAY tokens.

This brings the repurchase ratio to 5% of the current circulating supply.

8. Pump Fun

The Pump.fun platform currently generates over $1 million in daily revenue and uses 100% of that revenue to buy back tokens.

In September, they bought back $55 million worth of PUMP tokens, which would allow them to buy back approximately 30% of the circulating supply within a year.

9. Streamflow

39% of the Streamflow protocol's revenue is being used to buy back STREAM tokens and distribute them to stakers.

Taking July 2025 as an example, this means that 39% of the $247,000 in revenue that month (i.e., $96,330) will be used for STREAM token buybacks and staking reward distributions.

Recently, Magic Eden also launched a token buyback mechanism, which has repurchased 111,000 ME tokens and will use them all for staking rewards (the scale is expected to expand further in the future). Step Finance has also invested all of its platform revenue (including revenue from businesses such as Solanafloor and Remora Markets) into token buybacks.

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

OFAC Designates Two Iranian Finance Facilitators For Crypto Shadow Banking

OFAC Designates Two Iranian Finance Facilitators For Crypto Shadow Banking

The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned two Iranian financial facilitators for coordinating over $100 million worth of cryptocurrency in oil sales for the Iranian government, a September 16 press release shows. OFAC Sanctions Iranian Nationals According to the Tuesday press release, Iranian nationals Alireza Derakhshan and Arash Estaki Alivand “used a network of front companies in multiple foreign jurisdictions” to transfer the digital assets. OFAC alleges that Alivand and Derakhshan’s transfers also involved the sale of Iranian oil that benefited Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) and the Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL). IRGC-QF and MODAFL then used the proceeds to support regional proxy terrorist organizations and strengthen their advanced weapons systems, including ballistic missiles. U.S. officials say the move targets shadow banking in the region, where illicit financial actors use overseas money laundering and digital assets to evade sanctions. “Iranian entities rely on shadow banking networks to evade sanctions and move millions through the international financial system,” said Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence John K. Hurley. “Under President Trump’s leadership, we will continue to disrupt these key financial streams that fund Iran’s weapons programs and malign activities in the Middle East and beyond,” he continued. Dozens Designated In Shadow Banking Scandal Both Alivand and Derakhshan have been designated “for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of the IRGC-QF.” In addition to Alivand and Derakhshan, OFAC has sanctioned more than a dozen Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates-based entities and individuals tied to the network. According to the press release, the sanctioned entities may face civil or criminal penalties imposed as a result
Paylaş
CryptoNews2025/09/18 11:18